Nice use of the royal "we"! I hope the lens turns out to have an aristocratic pedigree.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
@lintoni: so by 10+ years you mean pretty soon I guess. Look at how much time has passed since the 50 L 1.2 or the 35 one has been announced. I don't think that Canon was creating cupcakes in the meantime. 50 mp sensor 5DS also takes a very long time to develop. They were also developing some L glass along with the body for sure... just that the production of new lenses has started much earlier. At least that's what I guess.That strikes me as the sensible way to do things - get some great lenses out before the high mp bodies. They showed off a 120mp sensor 5 years ago, so they knew top notch lenses were essential for the future.
So I'm expecting to see either a 50 L or 35 L coming very soon. Well... I'm more for the 50 L y'know
I think that 50mp sensors are a long long way from being the norm, they are at best either an item that affluent enthusiasts will lap up just to have the latest offering, or a niche camera for professionals, I doubt that many pro’s will be running out to buy one unless their particular area demands the benefits of having files this size. Which brings me back on topic, Canon won’t be in any hurry to produce a whole range of lenses for this sensor size, so deliberating on the current L glass IQ and how it will look at 50mp doesn’t really transfer across to what actual L lenses are coming soon, that’s just my thoughts on it. Still hoping for a long ranger for wildlife with a maximum price tag of around $3,000.Whilst I'm in no rush to get a 50mp body, they will become much more the norm in the future, and given that a good lens design could easily have a production life of 10+ years, Canon will be designing and producing lenses that are able to bring the best out of 50 (and higher) mp bodies.
What exactly is an STM drive (thanks in advance for any replies)?http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/standard_display/Lens_Advantage_Perf#usm
I agree with others that a 50 really should have IS. Seems as if there would be room for a 50 that is a bit nicer than the nifty fifty (I do have it and would upgrade) and an artsy 1.4.This is obviously a replacement for the current budget 50mm f/1.8, so to expect IS in such a lens is unrealistic. I'd hazard a guess that a replacement for the f/1.4 would include IS, but we have no idea when such a replacement might appear.
For all of you with the Sigma 50 Art, does the autofocus not work properly on a regular basis or are the posts on the topic greatly exaggerated? I like the sharpness from the lens, but I can't buy it if it doesn't nail focus almost every time I fire off a shot. I would be using it for shooting weddings on my 5DIII. Thanks.I couldn't honestly answer, as I only received the lens yesterday. However, I shared the same concerns as you (though I don't have to rely on it for a paying gig) and started a thread at dpreview asking for people's experiences with the 5D3/50 Art combo:
Chinese smartphone maker Xiaomi has launched a cheap action camera that costs only 399 yuan (£41).
The Yi Action Camera shoots video in 1080 high-definition, has a 16 megapixel camera and a wide-angle lens.
The device can also be used to make time-lapse films and is waterproof to depths of 40m.
Not really. If you were buying into a camera system, and had an eye to still be using that system in 5+ years, would you buy Sony? I certainly wouldn't. How many different mounts have Sony produced over the last few years? And have they managed to provide a comprehensive lens lineup for any of those mounts? And will they still be making any of them in 5 years?I'm impressed with his candor, but also with the Fuji products. If wouldn't surprise me if
ten years from now the big camera vendors are Canon, Fuji and Samsung.
It would surprise very much when there are brands like Nikon and Sony
Fuji is a small manufacturer, why would they suddenly become larger than Nikon, Sony?
Fuji is also a survivor. While Kodak went belly up, Fuji successfully navigated the transition from film (once their primary product) to digital.
Will they displace Nikon or Canon? I doubt it. But, I did read once that Fuji is the company that Canon was most concerned about, so maybe the admiration is mutual. Personally, I'm not convinced Sony is in the photography business for the long haul. Maybe as a supplier, but not sure I would invest in their system for fear it could disappear.
This lacks all credibility, Fuji are buying sensors from Sony and Toshiba, Sony has 60% of the world sensor market
Digital SLRs. Mid-range and high-end DSLRs like Canon’s EOS 7D Mark II, for example. Canon did a good job with that camera. And as we move into the telephoto lens area for wildlife photography and so on, those customers definitely need a better autofocus system. Just introducing a telephoto zoom is not a solution. Focus accuracy and speed has to be there.
One of the most interesting cameras in the past six months or so was the Canon EOS 7D Mark II. Historically Canon keeps its high-speed cameras at the top-end, in their professional cameras, but with the 7D II they’ve moved those features down into APS-C. So they see an opportunity in that format. The focusing system is really good.
Which is a fair point, but there are more Canon EF mount cameras sold than any other mount - which may be one reason why Sigma have possibly stopped producing their 24-105 Art...I too am in the camp where I'd like to see the 135mm prime get some love first.
I agree that they'd probably make an amazing 135 (I'm a huge ART-Line fan), but I'm pretty sure they can't compete with Canon's Price Point of about $1k for their VERY good 135 f2. If they come out with a lens faster than f2 or with OS, I'd be interested. However, I doubt there's really any money in it for them with Canon's stellar lens.
I'm pretty sure they could really cut into Canon's market share with a good new 85 ART since Canon's equivalent (and amazing) lens is $2K+. I'd been waiting for Sigma's 85, but couldn't wait any longer and pulled the trigger on the Canon. I'll be selling it if Sigma's 85 is as good as their other ART lenses.
I think you've gotta follow the money here, and Sigma's gonna make more with an 85 coming first (imho).
Sigma Art lenses are sold in multiple mounts, not just Canon.
The higher (usable) ISO the better for widefield astrophotography.ISO 100-204,800
Who can tell me why one should use an ISO of 204,800???
These specs does not seem very logic compared what you can get now.
In 2004, I heard the same thing about ISO 3200.
In 2011, I heard the same thing about ISO 12,800.
In 2013, I head the same thing about ISO 25,600.
I've been in plenty of extreme low-light conditions where I could see easily but I couldn't take pictures, even with an f/1.4 prime at ISO 12,800.
I did a little test one time to see what ISO it would take to get a picture about like I could see with my eyes after a full dark adaptation, at the same equivalent shutter speed (about 1/10th). My eyes can do black and white at an f-stop of about f/3.5 and an ISO of about 2 million when compared with a digital camera.