October 24, 2014, 03:56:08 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - RLPhoto

Pages: 1 ... 124 125 [126] 127 128 ... 234
1876
If its as good as the 35mm 1.4, I'd buy this over any 70-200 2.8. If I'm going to carry a heavy lens, Let it be heavy.

1877
Portrait / Re: How to take INCREDIBLE photos of your friends
« on: January 07, 2013, 05:21:35 PM »
O_o 

I can't hold my pose any longer.

1878
Software & Accessories / Re: CS2 free download?
« on: January 07, 2013, 02:20:13 PM »
Amazing! ADobE R0ck$!

1879
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Thinking of downgrading my 5d3 system
« on: January 07, 2013, 10:53:04 AM »
The mk3 is not the problem, the problem is those heavy 2.8 zooms which the 70-200L weights about 4LBs.

That's one reason I've come to love small, light primes. 24L + 50 1.4 + 135L are fantastic to carry. If you want mobility and lens speed, try some small primes.

Not a solution for everything, unless you carry at least 2 bodies around. Again, not for family photos.

I've taken plenty of family photos with just a Minolta maxxum AF and a 50mm 1.8. Just takes a different approach.

How do you approach this type of situation, when you are 1.5ft away from your subject? No room to go back or forward: http://albums.phanfare.com/isolated/0TKGEcfb/1/5903138

Find a different approach.

Since you are a prime shooter....what approach would you take? Swap to wider prime :P

See, You answered your own question.

Carry multiple prime lenses in a sunny day like this for family photos...WOW, what a creative photographer ::)     NO THANKS

You yourself said it.

1880
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Thinking of downgrading my 5d3 system
« on: January 07, 2013, 10:30:51 AM »
The mk3 is not the problem, the problem is those heavy 2.8 zooms which the 70-200L weights about 4LBs.

That's one reason I've come to love small, light primes. 24L + 50 1.4 + 135L are fantastic to carry. If you want mobility and lens speed, try some small primes.

Not a solution for everything, unless you carry at least 2 bodies around. Again, not for family photos.

I've taken plenty of family photos with just a Minolta maxxum AF and a 50mm 1.8. Just takes a different approach.

How do you approach this type of situation, when you are 1.5ft away from your subject? No room to go back or forward: http://albums.phanfare.com/isolated/0TKGEcfb/1/5903138

Find a different approach.

Since you are a prime shooter....what approach would you take? Swap to wider prime :P

See, You answered your own question.

1881
PowerShot / Re: Canon Announces The PowerShot N
« on: January 07, 2013, 10:04:35 AM »
If its ultra tiny, like razr thin and square, with decent IQ I would buy one.

1882
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Thinking of downgrading my 5d3 system
« on: January 07, 2013, 09:58:48 AM »
The mk3 is not the problem, the problem is those heavy 2.8 zooms which the 70-200L weights about 4LBs.

That's one reason I've come to love small, light primes. 24L + 50 1.4 + 135L are fantastic to carry. If you want mobility and lens speed, try some small primes.

Not a solution for everything, unless you carry at least 2 bodies around. Again, not for family photos.

I've taken plenty of family photos with just a Minolta maxxum AF and a 50mm 1.8. Just takes a different approach.

How do you approach this type of situation, when you are 1.5ft away from your subject? No room to go back or forward: http://albums.phanfare.com/isolated/0TKGEcfb/1/5903138

Find a different approach.

1883
Lenses / Re: Your "precious" lord of the red rings is?
« on: January 07, 2013, 12:31:49 AM »
Let it burn, insurance has that covered.

1884
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Thinking of downgrading my 5d3 system
« on: January 06, 2013, 09:56:15 PM »
The mk3 is not the problem, the problem is those heavy 2.8 zooms which the 70-200L weights about 4LBs.

That's one reason I've come to love small, light primes. 24L + 50 1.4 + 135L are fantastic to carry. If you want mobility and lens speed, try some small primes.

Not a solution for everything, unless you carry at least 2 bodies around. Again, not for family photos.

I've taken plenty of family photos with just a Minolta maxxum AF and a 50mm 1.8. Just takes a different approach.

1885
Lenses / Re: 24-70 or 24-105
« on: January 06, 2013, 02:56:14 PM »
You have everything covered in my book. Wide, normal and tele. If you want all three in a lens, only the 24-105L truly does that well for less $$$.

1886
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 1 ds mark3 vs 5d mark 3 image quality
« on: January 06, 2013, 02:52:28 PM »
5D3 > 1DS3

1887
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Anyone still using a 20D?
« on: January 06, 2013, 11:52:19 AM »
Was there any 10D users? I feel alone with saying how the 20D was the best thing since sliced bread.

1888
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Thinking of downgrading my 5d3 system
« on: January 06, 2013, 11:44:25 AM »
86 oz for 24-70 2.8 + 70-200 2.8 zooms vs 56 oz for 24L + 50mm 1.4 + 135L

The speed gain vs weight & versatility. That almost two pounds shed in weight.


1889
Lenses / Re: Lens mount play
« on: January 06, 2013, 11:10:11 AM »
There is alittle wiggle on my 5D3s. All my EF cameras are like that.

1890
Lenses / Re: 135mm + 1.4 extender _VS_ 70-200mm f/2.8 IS mkI
« on: January 06, 2013, 11:05:05 AM »
I've been wanting a 70-200II for awhile now and every time I pick one up I realize why I've been waiting so long. It's just heavy to lug around, white and 2000$.

Unless you do a lot of action photos, get the 70-200 but you will always have to lug it around. With the 135L, you just take a tiny little tele converter.


Pages: 1 ... 124 125 [126] 127 128 ... 234