July 29, 2014, 09:02:27 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ddashti

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10
61
EOS Bodies / Re: New Cinema Camera & Lenses for NAB 2013
« on: February 12, 2013, 04:26:19 PM »
By lenses do they mean regular lenses or cine lenses?

62
EOS Bodies / Re: Big Megapixel Camera in 2014
« on: February 07, 2013, 12:33:34 PM »
It's good to know that the probability of a 7D Mark II being released is increasing, but the possible replacement of the 5D Mark III? That would just upset many people.

63
Ah, what Maeda said can be interpreted in so many different ways...
It's like identifying unknown variables with unknown quantities.

64
Lenses / Re: 16-35 f/2.8II vs 17-40 f/4
« on: February 01, 2013, 03:14:59 AM »
As you may have already read previously, the key points to the 16-35 II are the extra stop of light, and the slightly lesser softness towards the edges.
At f/11 and f/13, the 16-35 II performs slightly better (not a big difference) than the 17-40 in most cases.
If you need the extra stop of light and money isn't an issue, the 16-35 II screams "get me." If you're on a budget and the extra stop doesn't matter (if you're primarily shooting in daylight), then the 17-40 would be the suitable choice.

65
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sigma Announces New 30mm f/1.4 for APS-C
« on: January 29, 2013, 12:00:49 PM »
For a second, I thought this was for FF. It would've been interesting to see an actual 30mm f/1.4, although the 24mm f/1.4 would've still been the winner of the category.

66
PowerShot / Re: New PowerShots for CP+, no DSLRs.
« on: January 28, 2013, 10:57:04 PM »
This isn't really a surprise, but adding a surprise to CP+ from Canon DSLR-wise would be great.

67
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon's Roadmap for 2013 [CR2]
« on: January 27, 2013, 11:08:52 AM »
Finally some CR2 level news! The 7D Mark II and the 100-400L would be an expected combination from Canon.
As for the rebels, is a new one really needed every year? It doesn't seem like they're upgrading them that much...

68
that's what the cynic would think. The optimist in me says "not the story of the day" means there's something bigger and juicier that'll eclipse the 7d replacement
I like your approach. But the question is (with that in mind): with something bigger/juicier, will two bodies splitting from the 7D be released and cause a forked road?

69
EOS Bodies / Re: Where are you EOS 70D?
« on: January 24, 2013, 09:58:04 AM »
Where are you EOS 7D Mark II?
What will happen to the 60Da after the 70D is released?
Will Canon try to pull off a 70Da?

70
EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: Canon EOS-1D C Information
« on: January 24, 2013, 09:56:41 AM »
The 1D C is already facing that many problems?
Canon definitely could've waited on this one.

71
EOS Bodies / Re: Patent: Noise & Aliasing Reduction for Small Pixels
« on: January 20, 2013, 11:10:47 AM »
If this actually applies to the 7D Mark II, then here comes the super-extended wait!

72
Canon General / Re: After CES Whats Next for Canon?
« on: January 18, 2013, 08:43:39 PM »
Although highly unlikely according to various opinions, announcing the 14-24 would be simply wonderful.
The 7D Mark II (separately) would potentially be an even bigger surprise.

73
Lenses / Re: New EOS-M Lenses Soon [CR2]
« on: January 17, 2013, 12:39:38 AM »
I'm looking forward to new regular EOS lenses, although news about EOS-M is always something interesting to "observe."

74
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Rumors is Touring Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia
« on: January 15, 2013, 10:36:27 PM »
Is that the 400 DO? It's a lens that's used quite rarely (from my observation, at least)!
Great to see it packed for shooting!

75
The concept reminds me of an Apple store, and the logo reminds me of a Windows store.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10