76
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon DSLR Body Rumors for 2013
« on: January 06, 2013, 12:51:41 AM »
7D Mark II any day now. Everyone's waiting!
May 21, 2013, 05:25:51 AM
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
77
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon Sells More DSLRs Than Anyone Else in 2012
« on: January 06, 2013, 12:51:17 AM »
I'd say Canon had so much to offer in 2012, especially the highly anticipated 5D Mark III.
78
EOS Bodies / Re: An EOS 3D Mention [CR1]
« on: January 05, 2013, 12:34:41 AM »
The name will indeed be misleading to many folks out there, which can't be helped.
79
PowerShot Cameras / Re: Canon France Teases New Products
« on: January 05, 2013, 12:33:30 AM »
This isn't the sort of thing you hear every day. Surprise us big time, Canon!
80
EOS Bodies / Re: A New Cinema EOS DSLR Body in 2013? [CR1]
« on: January 05, 2013, 12:32:41 AM »
I wonder if this type of cinema DSLR is really needed...
81
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 5d2 officially discontinued.
« on: January 05, 2013, 12:31:02 AM »
This body will always be a big part of DSLR history.
82
Lenses / Re: Patent: Supertelephoto DO Lenses With Macro Features
« on: December 21, 2012, 10:22:36 PM »
It would be quite incredible to see a super telephoto lens with macro features that has a focal length greater than 200mm. 800mm + macro would be unbelievable!
83
Lenses / Re: EF 24-70 f/2.8L IS Exists as a Working Prototype [CR2]
« on: December 20, 2012, 05:05:35 AM »
This addition will be greatly welcomed. It's really needed out there!
As for the f/4 non-IS, it's not so necessary.
As for the f/4 non-IS, it's not so necessary.
84
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L Non-IS to Be Discontinued in 2013 [CR2]
« on: December 18, 2012, 07:31:58 AM »
With the big price difference between this lens and the IS II one, you'd think they'd keep it in the market.
85
Lenses / Re: Patent: A New Canon EF 50 f/1.2 & Suggestion of a Full Frame Mirrorless?
« on: December 17, 2012, 07:02:51 AM »
Seems like Canon is updating their current 50mm line. Might as well do the f/1.8, too!
86
Lenses / Re: 2013 - The Year for 400mm Lenses? [CR1]
« on: December 16, 2012, 04:11:01 PM »
Since this is CR1, I'd say the greatest probability that one of those lenses get produced goes to the 100-400.
87
Lenses / Re: Lens Advice Please
« on: December 13, 2012, 08:53:40 PM »
I'd definitely go for the 50 f/1.4.
88
Lenses / Re: Ditch 100L for 70-200 L II ?
« on: December 13, 2012, 08:51:47 PM »
The 70-200 II is an absolutely amazing lens. The range and f/2.8 on it is simple awesome to have, and coupled with a telephoto extender, it provides an even wider ranger of possible usages.
All three lenses, though (100, 135, 70-200), are amazing lenses with multiple ways to use them.
All three lenses, though (100, 135, 70-200), are amazing lenses with multiple ways to use them.
89
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 14-24 f/2.8L in Late 2013 [CR2]
« on: December 13, 2012, 08:47:14 PM »
The 16-35 definitely covers a wider range of focal lengths, which is useful for certain purposes, but the 14-24 is theoretically better in every aspect except for the focal length in the long-range. Here's the main question: would a photographer get the 14-24 for the wider focal length and better performance, or would a photographer get the 16-35 for the versatility in focal length? I'd definitely pick the 14-24. Any day. It just offers so much more!
90
Lenses / Re: Help me choose: EF lens for 60D
« on: December 13, 2012, 01:36:43 AM »
Going with the 17-40 would be a great choice. It's a good lens to have when you upgrade to FF, and it performs quite nicely. Its build is quite solid, and it's water/dust resistant. Plus, it takes 77mm filters, which is what many lenses take!
Hope this helps
Hope this helps