November 20, 2014, 09:57:12 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - awinphoto

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 134
1
Photography Technique / Re: Game Ranches for photography
« on: November 19, 2014, 05:36:22 PM »
One thing to note is most zoos, wildlife parks, and captive habitats have copyrights on their animals and strictly prohibit commercial photography without their permission.

I photograph at both zoos and in "the wild" and I use them for different reasons.  My zoo shots are just for playing around - to get used to equipment and to practice in a controlled environment.  In the wild I will typically have very little time to react, so it is very wise to be familiar with my equipment ahead of time.

Getting photographs in the wild is difficult, but it's also very rewarding.  I am not a full time wildlife photographer, but I do spend at least an hour a day on it.  Many days I only "get" a few ducks or sparrows, but once in awhile I get something very nice.  Last week (while on my first walk with my 7D2) I found a coyote.  Over the weekend I found a family of river otters.

Animals are very different when in their own element vs. when they depend on people for food and care.  There is a different look to the animal's eyes.

Also keep in mind that a number of famous photographers have had their reputations ruined because they passed off a wild animal park photo as a truly wild one.

The ranches and parks we are talking about are pay per use places... They know you are using them for commercial use...  They typically have more authentic enclosures so they look good photographically... 

2
Photography Technique / Re: Game Ranches for photography
« on: November 19, 2014, 04:30:55 PM »
This is the difference between a "WILDlife photographer and someone who takes pictures at the zoo.

There is nothing wrong with taking pictures at a Zoo.
There is nothing wrong with taking pictures at the back yard feeder.
What is unethical is when you present your pictures as real "wildlife" taken in a natural setting.

Well that's just the thing... most wildlife photographers wont go to a sanctuary take an award winning photograph, and then submit to national geo and say they are in the middle of yellowstone...  But, in the end of the day, if a commercial photographer is assigned a task of getting a specific shot that an advertising or marketing manager wants of a leopard or wildcat stalking a prey and it has to be to ready for press on friday, there's little difference if they risk their lives and livelyhood in the wilderness hoping to get a shot vs going to a sanctuary and nailing the shot.  National Geo allows for many photographers to spend weeks if not months on assignment, but others dont get that luxury as a working photographer, a professional photographer. 

3
Photography Technique / Re: Game Ranches for photography
« on: November 19, 2014, 03:27:22 PM »
I've never shot at one (other than wild animal parks and zoo's), but i have talked to many who have, including many who have shot advertisements for national parks, zoo's and national geographic.  Here's the deal, there are key shots that many photographers are trying to get that frankly are difficult if not impossible to get without using the biggest telephoto lenses money can buy, and camping out for days on end hoping to get lucky.  And as one National Geographic photographer put it, some shots, frankly, if captured in the wild, means that you would have had to be close enough to the animal, and in some instances and animals, means that you would have seconds to get out of there before you become lunch.  The rest of the time, it's all about luck and patience... something many photographers dont have, especially if they are renting gear or on a deadline...  Does it take away from the purist POV?  perhaps...  If shot and framed properly, would the average viewer know if the scene was taken at a certain park or ranch vs out in the wild... nope. 

4
I was going to get one of the 82mm UV filters when I remembered that I have almost 2 dozen B+W filters tucked away and never used.  UV, ND, Pol, I just don't use filters.  so, I forced myself to resist adding another one.

If you have the urge, feel free to buy one and have it shipped to me =)  I'll test it out for you!

5
Lenses / Re: 400 f/2.8L II IS on sunny days and white jerseys
« on: October 20, 2014, 03:15:44 PM »
You know what?  While i hate to see equipment struggle like this it's hard to determine the issue on a forum.  If you would mail me your lens for a few weeks, i would be glad to test it out and give you a detailed report afterwards.  =) 

6
Reviews / Re: Are Gitzo's really overrated?!
« on: October 06, 2014, 01:30:56 PM »
They are overrated in the same way profoto lights are in the lighting arena, hassy's are in the MF arena, and the Nikon D800 is in our arena...  There are always going to be other manufacturers that can do the same thing cheaper, better, and have better customer support, and to those who do not need them, they are extremely over-rated.  I've come to the conclusion that in photography, there is no holy grail set-up... nothing you buy will make you a better photographer.  It can make your job easier and be more reliable, but in the end, it cannot do it's own thing and take it's own pictures.  If it's the gear (and the only gear that will help you do what you need and nothing else will do), then no, it's not overrated.

7
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Why haven't you left canon?
« on: October 01, 2014, 03:08:46 PM »
Shhhh!  Dont tell anyone, but the real reason i haven't left canon is while not in use, my Canon 5d mark 3 turns into a robot and is keeping me, my wife and children under lock and key... we cant escape... Even my brave dogs are prettified of 5d3 robot machine, or "killer" for short.  Killer has threatened to stalk me for all my days if I ever dare switch so for my safety and those in my family, we are Canon for life.  But Shhhh!  keep it on the down-low

8
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: One is the loneliest number...
« on: October 01, 2014, 01:39:24 PM »
I usually have 2 cameras... one primary, one backup... 

9
I wont lie... i am intrigued by the movie utility... what exactly does it do?

10
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: My new toy, Best of monopod in my Idea.
« on: September 29, 2014, 05:33:09 PM »
Video.  I have the fluid head but I haven't used it yet.  I'm fond of it... but I WANTED to love it... I think longer feet without the ball would make me happy, but I did use the ball to get the shaft perpendicular to the ground, so I'm complaining for very little reason.

I picked up a manfrotto with the feet... the 5d mkiii plus a lens unstable if the monopod is extended... but if I keep the neck strap around my neck... I minimize the risk of it falling due to being unbalanced. 

I tightened the ball and it isn't bad, but I feel as though I am lubing it up on the ball to keep it firm, but smooth.

It is heavy... but nothing a trip  or two to three gym can't solve.


Do you have the one i have, or the video version with the semi pivoting feet?  Mines pretty stable as long as it's in controlled environments...  and that's with my 5d3 and 24-105...  When using the 70-200, i have the collar so it's more balanced

Gotcha... i think my feet extend about 12-15 inches in each direction.  I've got 2 ball heads i use for it... one's a pistol grip, and ones a reg manfrotto ball head (photo head, not video)...  have no complaints...  i have had issues when i tried using it outdoors once (and forgot to pack my tripod), but really i woulda been shocked if it worked properly also...

11
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: My new toy, Best of monopod in my Idea.
« on: September 29, 2014, 05:16:21 PM »
I picked up a manfrotto with the feet... the 5d mkiii plus a lens unstable if the monopod is extended... but if I keep the neck strap around my neck... I minimize the risk of it falling due to being unbalanced. 

I tightened the ball and it isn't bad, but I feel as though I am lubing it up on the ball to keep it firm, but smooth.

It is heavy... but nothing a trip  or two to three gym can't solve.

Do you have the one i have, or the video version with the semi pivoting feet?  Mines pretty stable as long as it's in controlled environments...  and that's with my 5d3 and 24-105...  When using the 70-200, i have the collar so it's more balanced

12
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: My new toy, Best of monopod in my Idea.
« on: September 29, 2014, 04:21:36 PM »
Oh my that looks scary unstable standing alone like that!!!!  :o

Anyways you seemed to have been away for a while, glad to see you back posting your DIY specials! always a fun read  :)

Regards

While I do not have this monopod, i've got a http://www.adorama.com/BG682B.html...  Similar concept with removable feet or legs... I've had this monopod parked in the middle of a wedding ceremony on the center isle (after the precession during all the talking)... let it sit there with camera attached recording video of everything...  not one waiver or vibration...  now outside with any wind, heck no... but otherwise as long as it's balanced, it's pretty stable. 

13
Reviews / Re: Tony Northrup - D810 vs. 5D Mk3
« on: September 19, 2014, 03:27:44 PM »
Kinda funny... most my clients complain the 5d 3 images i make have TOO MUCH detail hence most my battle is softening their skin and pores, etc... if the D810 has more detail, that would give me even more work...  naw... i'm good... okay, carry on with your arguments, let me go heat up the popcorn. 

14
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: POLL: What's more important, gps or wifi?
« on: September 19, 2014, 10:35:01 AM »
Since i shoot in studio a good chunk of the time, GPS means little to me... wifi, if implemented successfully, would cut my time transferring photos, hopefully... 

15
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sigma at Photokina 2014
« on: September 19, 2014, 12:46:51 AM »
To me and my past experiences with lens, the zoomed extending part is a deal breaker...  Too many issues in the past with lenses that extend when zooming...  I loved the 70-300L, but even with that, the extending part is a deal breaker. 

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 134