Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Is it time to consider Sigma lenses seriously?? competitive to Canon?« on: August 14, 2013, 01:17:00 PM »
Yes, Before I buy my first Sigma Lens 50 mm. F/ 1.4---I compare with Canon Lens 50 mmm. F/ 1.4, and I read many Compare/ Review both Lens, And in the review tell me that Sigma Lens* in this Category is Better than Canon Lens in the Sharp area, and in the Color Contrast Area---BUT COST MORE THAN CANON = $ 50 US Dollars.
Yes, I buy this First Sigma Lens and Very Happy of this Big Babe.
Yes, I have 14 Canon Lenses, 2 Tamron Lenses, 1 Bower Lens, and 1 Sigma Lens---From 8 MM. Fish eye Lens to Canon EF 600 mm. F/ 4.0 L IS USM.
PS. AF. for Sigma Lenses are not good or FAST as Canon Lenses*
The Sigma 50mm f/1.4 is not a good lens, don't buy it.
Disagree completely. I'm using mine on full frame and it rocks. Great image quality, solid build, good AF. In the areas where Canon stagnates, Sigma picks up the slack. I'm considering getting the 15mm fisheye and the 35 1.4 next.