« on: May 07, 2014, 01:21:40 PM »
Is the 16-35 f/4L intended as a replacement for the current 17-40 f/4L
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Isn't the net effect that you are basically renting usage time on the software? What I mean is this--if you spend 2 years in it at a cost of $720 and then decide you have all the features you need and don't want any more upgrade, you have exactly nothing if you close your subscription, right? As opposed to spending that money on an actual software license that you can use indefinitely?
I've been mildly tempted, but it's the being locked in forever or you've got nothing (if indeed that's the case) that is the biggest turnoff to me.
Can't canon just design a LP-E6 II....same shape, better internals and work with any camera that takes the LP-E6
I love the autofocus system. I hated the autofocus on my 5D classic and my 7D was only a little better. Since I was trying to use prime lenses wide open for the shallow DOF it was really frustrating.