976
EOS Bodies / Re: 1D Mark V Spec List [CR1]
« on: August 17, 2011, 04:57:17 PM »
Besides the sensor math being wrong, this whole list of specs seems rather nonsensical.
The described camera seems guaranteed to disappoint everyone. A bunch of half-measures and nothing that would be considered game-changing.
I have more confidence in Canon that after all this time, when they finally release a new flagship, they know it must be nothing short of awesome. These specs are frankly a little boring.
This raises a question I've been wanting to ask for quite some time. What exactly constitutes a Canon Rumors source? Not being critical of Canon Rumors Guy, but just wondering. If I make up a bunch of specs and send an email that says I have access to inside information and these are the latest specs for the new Canon 8D Mark VIII, do I become a CR1 source? Do I have to substantiate anything or what?
It's Canon Rumors Guy's website and I appreciate that. Just wondering though what exactly a "source" is.
The described camera seems guaranteed to disappoint everyone. A bunch of half-measures and nothing that would be considered game-changing.
I have more confidence in Canon that after all this time, when they finally release a new flagship, they know it must be nothing short of awesome. These specs are frankly a little boring.
This raises a question I've been wanting to ask for quite some time. What exactly constitutes a Canon Rumors source? Not being critical of Canon Rumors Guy, but just wondering. If I make up a bunch of specs and send an email that says I have access to inside information and these are the latest specs for the new Canon 8D Mark VIII, do I become a CR1 source? Do I have to substantiate anything or what?
It's Canon Rumors Guy's website and I appreciate that. Just wondering though what exactly a "source" is.

