December 20, 2014, 08:08:27 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - willis

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 8
61
Lenses / Re: Lens suggestions for 3 weeks trip to Egypt and Jordan
« on: October 22, 2012, 11:08:56 AM »
I would personally take:
 -Wide angle (16-35L II or 17-40L)
 -Telezoom (70-200L II or 70-300L)
 -Walk-around (24-105L)

62
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Unreliable AF on 7D with FW 2.0.3?
« on: October 12, 2012, 08:14:31 AM »
Haven't noticed that problem :o
Worked like a charm with 1.2.5 - 2.0.0 and now with 2.0.3.

63
Canon General / Re: How do you sell your gear?
« on: October 11, 2012, 04:07:03 PM »
Would someone link CL to this? Would like to check it out.

64
EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: Settings for a movie
« on: October 11, 2012, 12:30:25 PM »
What else, Hmmm..

FPS and Shutter speed if you are going with 24FPS use 1/50th, 30FPS 1/60th etc. ISO between 100-800 ( With 5D3 you might go higher )

65
Abstract / Re: Abstract streetlight art
« on: October 10, 2012, 04:41:30 PM »
I would but have to wait another sunny day ... have rained now like 1½ week without stops.

66
Abstract / Re: Abstract streetlight art
« on: October 10, 2012, 01:48:32 PM »
Would love to go there!
But first I've need to finish my school ::)

67
Canon General / Re: DxOMark vs. Reality
« on: October 09, 2012, 01:40:49 PM »
Regarding the glass, DxO is probably the only source that suggests 70-200 f/2.8 IS mkII is less sharp than mark I (suggesting mkII is better in the center but overall mkI is better, if my memory is not failing me). I do not think that affected the 70-200 f/2.8 mkII sales either, rather the effect was on the credibility of the DxO...

Cheers!
And I've always heard that MK2 is superb sharp even sharper than MK1.

68
Lenses / Re: 100mm f/2.8L IS vs 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II for Macro
« on: October 08, 2012, 09:44:13 AM »
Once you're talking about extension tubes so how much closer does 25mm extension take focusing?

69
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 14-24 f/2.8L [CR2]
« on: October 07, 2012, 01:30:39 PM »
Anything new about 14-24 F2.8L?

70
EOS Bodies / Re: Looks like the 6D may not be so bad after all
« on: October 07, 2012, 12:26:25 PM »
Kinda funny to test FF against APS-C body and older tech what 7D holds.

71
EOS Bodies / Re: Is Canon EOS-1S the Name? [CR1]
« on: October 06, 2012, 11:10:09 AM »
At least the name makes sense 1S, S=Studio but $9000 doesn't make sense in this one 8)

72
LR 4.1 and Photoshop CS6, but 70% off editing on LR 4.1 after that if it needs some photoshopping I export the image to Photoshop to add final touch.

73
On the bright side, you're alive and well.
Oh you tiger.. You so random! ;D

But how about lenses. Survived all that?

74
Canon General / Re: Europe trip, 1-2 months
« on: October 01, 2012, 03:23:58 PM »
Also Estonia would be one nice old place to be checked.

75
Lenses / Re: 24-70 MK II or 70-200 MK II?
« on: October 01, 2012, 02:10:26 PM »
You can find 24-105 F4L from 2nd hand pretty easily and bit cheaper, so if you want it so badly just look for ebay or some other 2nd shops. 8)

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 8