« on: May 22, 2012, 09:50:18 AM »
Any reason you need IS for that 70-200 f/4? I don't have it on mine, and I haven't missed it. Then again, 90% of my images use a tripod.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Knowing canons pricing system, expect 2000$ and up.
But if you want to "speed up" the aperture, then you need to make it bigger. My original post was to re-design the 50 f/1.4, not turn it into a 50 f/1.x, where x is <4. I understood what the guy meant...in that context it just didn't make sense. Of course, it could have been a language issue, as I understand that CR attracts readers from all over the globe.
The comment was a facetious observation that the title of the thread says f/14, not f/1.4.
Move along folks.
My dream 50mm f/14 has a faster aperture...
I guess I don't understand this statement. Aperture is a size, not a speed...
You are "technically" correct in saying that aperture is a size, not a speed. But colloquially a "larger" aperture lens (or which is colloquially known as "glass") is addressed as a "faster" lens. So "faster" aperture means "larger" aperture. But I am not really clear why "faster" is used. May be because it allows for (relatively) faster shutter speeds at the maximum aperture or may be for some other reason.
im not very tempted to update my second body, a 550D, to this.
i would like to have a new crop body.. but i guess it´s the old sensor and i don´t need video enhancements.
I don't think I have ever even considered using any of my fast primes, except the 24 and 17 at apertures narrower than 2,0. 5,6 comparison? Not why you buy 1,2 lens.
I wanted to purchase a 50mm 1.2 but wanted to know if a new 50mm will be coming out soon. Putting budget aside, would you get a 50mm 1.2 or a 1.4?
let it all ride on black and then start a post about having 8k to spend and not know what to do with it.
So it seems that I need to be deciding between the 50 1.2L and 85 1.2L. What do you guys think about the 50 1.4? Is the difference between the 1.2 and 1.4 that much significant to justify the additional $1100?
Hey, a camera! Oh, it's just a Rebel with a 75-300mm f/5.6. Clarity and chromatic aberration are both notably poor on this glass. I guess I'll just leave it alone.
Hey a camera! And it's a 5DmkIII with a 70-200mm f/2.8 L, non-IS. Exceptional IQ, and the bokeh quality is to die for. I'd better grab it before somebody else does.
My dream 50mm f/1.4... hmm.
It should have better sharpness wide open, a proper ultrasonic motor and should be able to destroy a small planet around the size of Alderaan. It should be fully operational within 3 months of its announcement.