September 17, 2014, 01:37:08 AM

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
61
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: First images of the new fantastic Samsung NX1!
« Last post by Orangutan on September 16, 2014, 11:09:38 PM »
When do we get to see the first raw images FROM the fantastic Samsung NX1!

And when do we get to see impartial, hands-on evaluations of all of it's features?

Don't get me wrong, I'm cheering for mirrorless, and also for innovations from the smaller manufacturers in order to put pressure on Canon.  So far I've been disappointed, though.
62
EOS Bodies / Re: How can we improve on 5D3 to 5D4?
« Last post by unfocused on September 16, 2014, 11:08:02 PM »
I'm sure Canon will figure out some things that will make me want it, but right now, I can't imagine what they would be. 5DIII has everything I need and more.
63
EOS Bodies / Re: High ISO Samples from the Canon EOS 7D Mark II
« Last post by ishdakuteb on September 16, 2014, 11:06:02 PM »
LOL at the trolling regarding the 7D2 AF, first of all the guy was making an informal test of the High ISO SOOC JPEGs from the cam, not its AF performance.

Yes, an informal test, so the results of it should be universally ignored or taken with a grain of salt.

at least he has his gut to post his out of focus image?  how about you?  take your best focus camera and try to beat me with my classic canon 7d which number of people in here complain about auto focus...  post your similar sharp image like the one below which was taken with canon 7d and 24-105mm f/4...

sadly that i have to say, imo, that 7d mark ii should beat both canon 1d-x and 5d mark iii in auto focus and yes, i am not bias in this saying since i am one of those canon 5d mark iii owners...
64
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: First images of the new fantastic Samsung NX1!
« Last post by unfocused on September 16, 2014, 11:04:41 PM »
Meh
65
EOS Bodies / Re: High ISO Samples from the Canon EOS 7D Mark II
« Last post by dilbert on September 16, 2014, 11:04:21 PM »
To everyone talking about the ISO 3200 pic being OOF

IF you watch the video you will see that the ISO 3200 pic isn't even the same one shown in the video.

Not much credibility with this guys article.

So Matt Granger (mattgranger.com) took a bunch of quick snaps to get some web traffic and guess what?

Matt Granger cannot take photographs. Matt Granger is a bad camera reviewer. Matt Granger is a bad photographer.

Summary: Matt Granger is a tool and I would never hire or buy from this guy.
66
Lenses / Re: Choose your Weapon: Ultra Wide Zooms for Canon
« Last post by TexPhoto on September 16, 2014, 11:03:46 PM »
8-15mm f4 L
Tokina 11-17

Both work great for me, but did not make your list.  The 11-17 is a nice lens on my 1D Mark IV, and the 8-15 does free on FF to crop.
67
Pricewatch Deals / Re: The Illumination Experience With Shane Hurlbut
« Last post by EchoLocation on September 16, 2014, 11:03:24 PM »
Quite frankly I think there are enough ads in the site as it is. I just find this a complete turn off. Doesn't show a great lack of respect for members. Way to drag down a really good site.
I don't think this site has more ads than any other websites, and I respect the site operators need to make a living from their hard work. While I am not interested in this ad/opportunity, the moment it took me to scan through it and figure out I didn't care wasn't a big deal. I'd just like to say thanks again to the admin for all persistence and dedication to keeping us up to date on everything happening in the Canon ecosystem. This is one of my favorite sites on the net and I visit it multiple times a day from my home and office in China! I hope that this ad helps them to keep the site going and allows them to continue providing us with excellent content.
Thanks again admin!
68
Lenses / Re: Choose your Weapon: Ultra Wide Zooms for Canon
« Last post by dilbert on September 16, 2014, 11:01:29 PM »
Will be interesting to see what Tamron delivers with the 15-30.
69
EOS Bodies / Re: How can we improve on 5D3 to 5D4?
« Last post by V8Beast on September 16, 2014, 10:55:32 PM »
A built in condom dispenser because the 5D3 sure seems popular with the ladies ;D Or maybe it's just me :o
70
Lenses / Re: EF11-24mm F4L listed on a Japanese site
« Last post by TokyoDekopon on September 16, 2014, 10:53:07 PM »
FYI, it was posted in the following page as the image of EF24-105mm F3.5-5.6 IS STM. They changed it to the correct image after a short while. Not just me but a lot of people saw it. Looking forward to the official announcement!
http://kakaku.com/item/K0000693675/#tab
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10