December 02, 2016, 03:00:45 PM

Author Topic: Canon Announces 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS  (Read 47410 times)

Edwin Herdman

  • Guest
Re: Canon Announces 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS
« Reply #60 on: September 11, 2010, 06:17:44 PM »
I think the key "problem" with the lens is that it doesn't cater enough to sports / press users who would like a larger maximum aperture, regardless of ISO performance.  This certainly is the issue for me.  A larger maximum aperture would definitely come with weight and more expense, of course.  The MTF curves are very promising, and the new IS rounds it out.

Everything about the features of this lens and the press information Canon put out suggests this is targeted for advanced amateurs, not professionals who I hope will be getting a lens targeted for them in the future (with at least f/4 at the 300mm end).

A Canon equivalent of the Nikon 200-400 would be nice too...

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Canon Announces 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS
« Reply #60 on: September 11, 2010, 06:17:44 PM »

neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • ************
  • Posts: 19976
Re: Canon Announces 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS
« Reply #61 on: September 15, 2010, 07:10:22 AM »
Everything about the features of this lens and the press information Canon put out suggests this is targeted for advanced amateurs, not professionals who I hope will be getting a lens targeted for them in the future (with at least f/4 at the 300mm end).

I suppose Canon thinks the 'real' professionals will be using the new supertele primes, like the 300mm f/2.8L IS II. 

But in a way, Canon has already given us a ~100-300mm f/4 lens with great IQ.  The newish 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II takes a 1.4x teleconverter very well, giving an 89-280mm f/4 lens that's sharper at 280mm f/4 than the Mk I version of the lens at 200mm f/2.8 (see a comparison HERE). 
EOS 1D X, EOS M2, lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

kubelik

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 824
Re: Canon Announces 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS
« Reply #62 on: September 15, 2010, 12:58:11 PM »
neuro, thanks for the link -- I'm surprised the difference is that huge.  another alternative I'd like to highlight is sigma's 100-300mm f/4. 

it doesn't have IS, and it has probably the worst lens hood I've ever worked with, but other than those two issues, it's a great lens (even disregarding the sweet price) for anyone interested in shooting in the 300mm range

neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • ************
  • Posts: 19976
Re: Canon Announces 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS
« Reply #63 on: September 15, 2010, 01:04:13 PM »
neuro, thanks for the link -- I'm surprised the difference is that huge.

Yeah, I was, too.  That's one reason I got the new 70-200 II, in fact.  I have and really like the 100-400mm L, but it's not weather-sealed, whereas the 70-200 II + 1.4x gives me 100-300mm that I can take out in the rain.  It's a constant f/4, which is great - but it's big and a bit unbalanced.  Now, here comes this new 70-300mm L, which loses a stop at the long end compared to the 70-200 II + 1.4x, but is a lot smaller and still has weather sealing.  If it manages to beat out the 70-200 II + 1.4x for sharpness, it becomes a much more interesting lens (and one for which I might consider changing out my 70-300mm DO). 
EOS 1D X, EOS M2, lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

Edwin Herdman

  • Guest
Re: Canon Announces 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS
« Reply #64 on: September 16, 2010, 03:02:56 AM »
On the sharpness front, you might get an idea how the extender 1.4x would affect the 70-200mm IS II by looking at the differences to the new 300mm or 400mm.  Here's the 300mm.  The 70-300mm's MTF lines are close to the 70-200mm's, but I'm not expecting a big drop off in performance with the extender.  For me, the question is more whether the loss of the wide end and the aperture, and the cost and weight, are worth the slightly wider maximum aperture.

Mark D5 TEAM II

  • 5DSR
  • *******
  • Posts: 1247
  • Proud N0ink 0wnz0r / crApple iFruitcake H4t3r
Re: Canon Announces 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS
« Reply #65 on: September 16, 2010, 09:42:50 AM »
Another bad thing with this lens, as revealed by TDP, is that it's already at f/5.0 way before 200mm, at 155mm in fact.

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-70-300mm-f-4-5.6-IS-L-USM-Lens-Review.aspx

Quote
The 70-300 L appears to be very sharp wide open including good sharpness into the full frame corners at focal lengths up to and including 135mm. I expect to see nearly as good of performance right up to 300mm, but because of poor test conditions, I'm not yet ready to state this with any certainty.
 
I think we are going to see a little CA (Chromatic Aberration) in 70mm full frame corners, but little or nearly-none over the rest of the focal length range.
 
Distortion appears to be about average for a 70-300mm lens. Expect some 70mm barrel distortion transitioning to pincusion by just over 100mm. Pincusion distortion becomes moderate by 200mm and remains so through 300mm.


In short, the 70-200 f/4L IS + 300 f/4L IS would be a better choice, assuming money is enough for that but not enough for the 2.8 versions.
Nikon NSF16 5-Leaf Dual-Blade Industrial Fan ¦ Nikon NTMFI-H1 Dry Heavy Flat Iron ¦ Nikon Tough Mama NTMRC1-2S Rice Cooker “Limited Edition” ¦ Nikon Tough Mama NTMJK18-S Stainless Electric Kettle Plate Type ¦ Nikon NHT 2-in-1 Curling Iron & Straightener in One ¦ Nikon N4004s Decision Master System™

neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • ************
  • Posts: 19976
Re: Canon Announces 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS
« Reply #66 on: September 16, 2010, 10:19:31 AM »
In short, the 70-200 f/4L IS + 300 f/4L IS would be a better choice, assuming money is enough for that but not enough for the 2.8 versions.

Except then you'd be carrying two lenses instead of one lens that's smaller than either of them.  The big advantage of this new lens is reach and IQ in a very portable package.  For more reach with the same slowness, bring a 100-400.  For less reach and more speed, bring a 70-200/2.8.  If I'm going out shooting from pre-dawn through the morning or afternoon through twilight, I bring both the 100-400 and the 70-200 II.  But if I'm going out in the middle of the day and bringing my toddler along, neither of the big white zooms is coming.  Currently, I've got the 70-300 DO for such outings.  The new 70-300 L adds a bit of length and weight, and seems to have much better IQ - that's not a bad trade.
EOS 1D X, EOS M2, lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Canon Announces 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS
« Reply #66 on: September 16, 2010, 10:19:31 AM »

neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • ************
  • Posts: 19976
Re: Canon Announces 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS
« Reply #67 on: September 16, 2010, 10:23:49 AM »
The 70-300mm's MTF lines are close to the 70-200mm's, but I'm not expecting a big drop off in performance with the extender.

If you mean you're not expecting a big performance drop when pairing the new 70-300 L with a Canon extender, I disagree.  With that combination you'd take the ultimate performance hit - a completely unusable lens.  The 70-300 L is not compatible with Canon extenders. 

I can tell you from personal experience that the 70-200 II performs quite well with the 1.4x II, though.
EOS 1D X, EOS M2, lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

Edwin Herdman

  • Guest
Re: Canon Announces 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS
« Reply #68 on: September 17, 2010, 05:35:06 AM »
Bah, I'd read about that elsewhere and forgotten.  Guess the rear focus elements would hit the extender's optics.

Agreed totally on the balance of the new lens versus the multi-lens solution.  What's more, it's simply a newer lens and the other factors (new IS system, weather and dust sealing, better ergonomics) make me feel it's a reasonable investment compared to older designs.

Another bad thing with this lens, as revealed by TDP, is that it's already at f/5.0 way before 200mm, at 155mm in fact.
Thanks for the link and information - I wasn't expecting Bryan C. to update from the placeholder page so quickly!  Guess my faith he's an insider was well placed.  Anyway, I was afraid that the maximum aperture would become rather low quite quickly, though that is rather more extreme than I expected.  I'm not sure it will matter to me though - for 300mm, for instance, the sole affordable choice (for me) besides other zooms is the aging f/5.6 L single-focal length design, which I was considering previous to the 70-200mm (as mentioned before).  If I need a faster 200mm lens, there are some good single focal length options available such as the 200mm telephoto, or the 180mm macro.  I do think that continuing improvements on ISO and the tradeoffs in the AF performance of lower-tier DSLRs means that this will probably be a better match for those cheaper systems, at the expense of a more artistic look from faster lenses and more noise in low-light pictures.

neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • ************
  • Posts: 19976
Re: Canon Announces 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS
« Reply #69 on: September 17, 2010, 06:19:18 AM »
I do think that continuing improvements on ISO and the tradeoffs in the AF performance of lower-tier DSLRs means that this will probably be a better match for those cheaper systems, at the expense of a more artistic look from faster lenses and more noise in low-light pictures.

Absolutely - and that's exactly where Canon has stated they are positioning this lens.  I have to assume there are quite a few xxD, 7D, and even some Rebel owners who want to step up from the base level (55-250/75-300) or mid-level (70-300 non-L) to a better quality telezoom, but then look at the 70-200L's and figure they're not long enough, and look at the 100-400 and think, "I can't lug that beast around!" 

It's still definitely a compromise lens, but with some very reasonable compromises.
EOS 1D X, EOS M2, lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

docsmith

  • Canon 7D MK II
  • *****
  • Posts: 490
Re: Canon Announces 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS
« Reply #70 on: September 17, 2010, 04:58:12 PM »
Absolutely - and that's exactly where Canon has stated they are positioning this lens.  I have to assume there are quite a few xxD, 7D, and even some Rebel owners who want to step up from the base level (55-250/75-300) or mid-level (70-300 non-L) to a better quality telezoom, but then look at the 70-200L's and figure they're not long enough, and look at the 100-400 and think, "I can't lug that beast around!" 

It's still definitely a compromise lens, but with some very reasonable compromises.

Yep.  If you are only going to buy and own 1 telephoto "L" lens you are going to have to make compromises in which lens you buy.  I see this lens taking a lot of that market. 


unfocused

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *********
  • Posts: 3301
    • Mark Gordon Communications
Re: Canon Announces 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS
« Reply #72 on: September 22, 2010, 07:52:50 PM »
Sigma's non-stabilized 120-300 f2.8 lens sells for $3,000 street. That should give a rough idea of what the stabilized version is going to sell for.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Canon Announces 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS
« Reply #72 on: September 22, 2010, 07:52:50 PM »

Freeze_XJ

  • Guest
Re: Canon Announces 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS
« Reply #73 on: September 23, 2010, 04:54:30 AM »
However, its size and price (and the 2 stops extra) put it in a whole different market. I can see myself put a 70-300L in my backpack (like i do now with the non-L version) as an allround tele, but lugging that 300 2.8 around would probably break my back(pack).

neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • ************
  • Posts: 19976
Re: Canon Announces 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS
« Reply #74 on: September 23, 2010, 06:10:58 AM »
Bump with yet another challenger....Sigma announces stabilised 120-300mm F2.8 telezoom

I don't know that I'd call it a challenger to the new 70-300mm L.  As Canon stated, "Users looking to a camera like the EOS 60D or 7D often put a priority on reasonable weight and good handling, and this applies to their lenses as well as their cameras. Until now, Canon’s long zoom lens options have meant either putting up with lots of weight..."

The current non-OS Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 is as long as an extended Canon 100-400mm and it's twice the weight.  Even if Sigma can add OS without adding to the size/weight, the Sigma lens is still big and heavy.  That's not really the market Canon is going after with their new lens.

If the reportedly slow AF in the non-OS version is is carried through into the new OS version, I think the Canon 300mm f/2.8 would be a better choice, and likely there won't be too much price difference (relatively) between the new Sigma OS zoom and the MkI version of the Canon prime.
EOS 1D X, EOS M2, lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Canon Announces 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS
« Reply #74 on: September 23, 2010, 06:10:58 AM »