December 11, 2016, 09:00:38 AM

Author Topic: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark  (Read 64666 times)

dr croubie

  • 5DSR
  • *******
  • Posts: 1382
  • Too many photos, too little time.
Re: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark
« Reply #15 on: March 23, 2012, 10:26:09 PM »
That is for in-camera produced JPEG files only, which means the software in the camera is better, not the hardware.

If that's referring to me saying 'stop or two better', i thought that RAW was a stop better, JPG was 2-stops better?

Or we'll just have to wait for the 5D3 DxO results...
Too much gear, too little space.
Gear Photos

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark
« Reply #15 on: March 23, 2012, 10:26:09 PM »

sparda79

  • Rebel T6i
  • ****
  • Posts: 148
    • Tingkap Vistaku
Re: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark
« Reply #16 on: March 23, 2012, 10:28:45 PM »
I congratulate Nikon on producing a stellar camera in the D800. Now can someone please post sample images taken with both a D800 and a 5DIII, where the D800 made them a better photographer? I have a feeling that I'll be waiting for a long time.
Easy to spot Canon images they are the ones with banding in the shadows & with burnt out highlights  & very poor  reds , I love the Canon red colour its a great red just like to see more shades of red sometimes.

Reds are poor with defaults from ACR in some Canon models, but I found I can tweak settings and get detail without too much trouble.  For more troublesome color images, I use DPP, which usually nails the color.


Totally agree. The ACR defaults handles Canon's red poorly.
Used to be very frustrating...
EOS 6D | 24-105L | 100L | 70-200L II | 2x III | RX100M3

Higs42

  • Guest
Re: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark
« Reply #17 on: March 23, 2012, 10:38:45 PM »
So in summary, when you compare the new Nikon that is just hitting the market, it outperforms a Canon 5d2 that was designed in 2008.  Mother of god, who would have guessed?

psolberg

  • Canon 7D MK II
  • *****
  • Posts: 550
Re: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark
« Reply #18 on: March 23, 2012, 10:55:38 PM »
So in summary, when you compare the new Nikon that is just hitting the market, it outperforms a Canon 5d2 that was designed in 2008.  Mother of god, who would have guessed?
No. It beats everything recent. And this is the terrible high mp sensor everybody dismissed as being noisy and bad :-)

V8Beast

  • 5DSR
  • *******
  • Posts: 1121
    • Stephen Kim Automotive Photography
Re: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark
« Reply #19 on: March 23, 2012, 11:07:08 PM »
So in summary, when you compare the new Nikon that is just hitting the market, it outperforms a Canon 5d2 that was designed in 2008.  Mother of god, who would have guessed?
No. It beats everything recent. And this is the terrible high mp sensor everybody dismissed as being noisy and bad :-)

Yes, there were lots of Canon fan body in denial, but I think the D800 has proven itself as having a great sensor. To my eyes, however, the real-world benefits of its awesomeness are tough to spot in most of the images taken with it so far.

Higs42

  • Guest
Re: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark
« Reply #20 on: March 23, 2012, 11:09:43 PM »
The data presented here is for the old Canon cameras.  We will see how the new Nikon compares to the new Canon cameras at some point, but not yet.  So at least keep your comments to reality, not making things up that you hope or wish to be true.  If you have the data for the 5D3 or 1DX, let's see it and we can discuss, but comparing a new camera to 4 year old designs was my point.

birtembuk

  • Rebel T6i
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
Re: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark
« Reply #21 on: March 24, 2012, 12:04:38 AM »
Numbers are numbers, field is field and I would not buy a gear based on DxO reviews. Just remember the review of the 70-200/2.8II by them. It fares worse than the Sony 70-200/2.8 G...

We are talking here of pure academic assessment by guys in white coat in an immaculate lab. In absolute terms, for sure the D800 sensor will out-resolve the 5D3's. Period. No need whining. Now, just pixel-peep the Still-life 6400 at http://www.imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP/COMPS01.HTM and compare between D800 and 5D3. Not surprisingly, D800 will out-resolve the 5D3 in the fabrics area. This is to be expected as fabrics are sort of micro 3D textures that require lots of resolving power for extracting details. Good if you are in the garment industry. Now, move around anywhere else in the pictures and conclude by yourself. For me, there's a two stops difference in ISO. As far as I am concerned, that's what I am looking for.   

So, what's the big deal here ? ISO or resolution ? Just make you pick and be happy ever after.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark
« Reply #21 on: March 24, 2012, 12:04:38 AM »

SRHelicity

  • Guest
Re: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark
« Reply #22 on: March 24, 2012, 12:22:14 AM »
So in summary, when you compare the new Nikon that is just hitting the market, it outperforms a Canon 5d2 that was designed in 2008.  Mother of god, who would have guessed?
No. It beats everything recent. And this is the terrible high mp sensor everybody dismissed as being noisy and bad :-)

Yes, there were lots of Canon fan body in denial, but I think the D800 has proven itself as having a great sensor. To my eyes, however, the real-world benefits of its awesomeness are tough to spot in most of the images taken with it so far.

+1

The data are what they are.  The results are not "biased" (I hear "DxO is biased against Canon" occasionally, which is false) -- they are designed to be objective.  However, what is important is to remember what the numbers represent.  They do not represent ease of use, speed and complexity of the AF system, and in-camera features.  They don't represent the lens ecosystem, nor do they represent the accessories that are available for that particular camera.  Altogether, they DO NOT represent which camera will be best for YOU.  We all have different shooting characteristics (shooting sports vs. portraits vs. landscapes, etc.) and buying criteria (budget, lenses owned, etc.), so a camera with a higher DxO score doesn't mean that it'd be better for YOU or for ME.  DxO results *are* effective at giving us some objective data, however, to allow us to judge sensor performance.

dr croubie

  • 5DSR
  • *******
  • Posts: 1382
  • Too many photos, too little time.
Re: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark
« Reply #23 on: March 24, 2012, 12:31:21 AM »
Thus far, all the evidence points to the 5D3 being about the same as the 5D2 for ISO 100 through to 400.

And if that's the case, regardless of how well the 5D3 does in high-iso performance, if the iso 100-400 just plateaus again at 12-13 bits DR, then they're pretty much handing landscape photographers on a platter over to Nikon...
Too much gear, too little space.
Gear Photos

Astro

  • Guest
Re: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark
« Reply #24 on: March 24, 2012, 05:52:19 AM »
And please no, "What if Canon makes a camera like this in a year with more MPs are you going to switch back?"  Because the truth is I wouldn't switch back because Canon will never make a camera like this, not in a long time if ever.

if i had your gift to foresee the future i would not waste my time in a studio with a 35mm.... i would go to vegas!!

KeithR

  • Guest
Re: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark
« Reply #25 on: March 24, 2012, 07:28:52 AM »
I congratulate Nikon on producing a stellar camera in the D800. Now can someone please post sample images taken with both a D800 and a 5DIII, where the D800 made them a better photographer? I have a feeling that I'll be waiting for a long time.
Quote
Even when you do pixel peep, people reach different conclusions based on their biases. If this is someone's idea of enjoying photography, I find it quite pathetic.
Quote
To my eyes, however, the real-world benefits of its awesomeness are tough to spot in most of the images taken with it so far.
And yet you'd already decided that the D800 was the way to go, purely on the basis of spec sheets.
« Last Edit: March 24, 2012, 07:34:23 AM by KeithR »

KeithR

  • Guest
Re: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark
« Reply #26 on: March 24, 2012, 07:31:04 AM »
Which is impressive given the much smaller pixel pitch
Pixel pitch has no relevance whatsoever to relative sensor performance.

smirkypants

  • Guest
Re: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark
« Reply #27 on: March 24, 2012, 07:45:13 AM »
That sound.... that loud rumbling... it's the sound of a herd of Canon landscape photographers rushing to buy a D800 and a 14-24/2.8. It crushes on MP and it crushes on DR. It will happen, and all the defensive fanboy snottiness isn't going to change that.

I don't shoot landscape. The D800 is the wrong camera for me, but all the signs point to it being killer.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark
« Reply #27 on: March 24, 2012, 07:45:13 AM »

Astro

  • Guest
Re: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark
« Reply #28 on: March 24, 2012, 07:55:44 AM »
i will ask david noton what he will do.....

AvTvM

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 2332
Re: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark
« Reply #29 on: March 24, 2012, 08:38:34 AM »
That sound.... that loud rumbling... it's the sound of a herd of Canon landscape photographers rushing to buy a D800 and a 14-24/2.8. It crushes on MP and it crushes on DR. It will happen, and all the defensive fanboy snottiness isn't going to change that.

I don't shoot landscape. The D800 is the wrong camera for me, but all the signs point to it being killer.

+1
agree 100%   

14.4 stops DR @ ISO 100 ... wow! Even if DXO-Marks intransparent testing was off by 2 stops, it would still best any Canon including 5D III by quite some margin.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark
« Reply #29 on: March 24, 2012, 08:38:34 AM »