The 24-105 is super impressive. The size might be too much for my event work but anyone who uses a tripod could have just found their endgame do-everything lens.
Upvote
0
If one gets used to the 28-70, this would actually be a little easier to handle.The 24-105 is super impressive. The size might be too much for my event work but anyone who uses a tripod could have just found their endgame do-everything lens.
Same. Definitely buying the 10-18. Then eventually 200-800.I must be the oddbird here, but I'm most interested in the new rf-s 10-18mm, the other two are out of my (justified) price range right now. 200-800 is still something to look after, and might be added to my collection some day.
Personally not interested in 24-105 F2.8.
Now I have to wait the reviews of the wonderfully compact, light and small rf-s 10-18mm. And I think it is really going to be very satisfying lens for me. Must be as good as ef-m 11-22, or better, right? And with a hood!! Wow!
I too am interested in picking up the 10-18mm. I shoot with an R5 and don’t own anything wider than 24mm. There has been an occasion or two where wider than 24mm would’ve been nice to have but I can’t bring myself to spend over a thousand dollars on a large zoom lens I’m going to use so infrequently. I’ll happy throw that small of a lens in my bag and accept crop mode for the rare occasion I want an UWA.I must be the oddbird here, but I'm most interested in the new rf-s 10-18mm, the other two are out of my (justified) price range right now. 200-800 is still something to look after, and might be added to my collection some day.
Personally not interested in 24-105 F2.8.
Now I have to wait the reviews of the wonderfully compact, light and small rf-s 10-18mm. And I think it is really going to be very satisfying lens for me. Must be as good as ef-m 11-22, or better, right? And with a hood!! Wow!
You can also get the prime RF 16mm f2.8 - it'll have the same FoV as RF-S at 10mm but without cropping., so you get the full frame. It's also pretty small.I too am interested in picking up the 10-18mm. I shoot with an R5 and don’t own anything wider than 24mm. There has been an occasion or two where wider than 24mm would’ve been nice to have but I can’t bring myself to spend over a thousand dollars on a large zoom lens I’m going to use so infrequently. I’ll happy throw that small of a lens in my bag and accept crop mode for the rare occasion I want an UWA.
That was my original plan but lately I’ve been using the crop mode for 4K video so this lens would be useful for that as opposed to the 16mm which just turns into a 25.6mm equivalent as opposed to this lens which would be a 16-25.6mm equivalent zoom.You can also get the prime RF 16mm f2.8 - it'll have the same FoV as RF-S at 10mm but without cropping., so you get the full frame It's also pretty small.
And yet the 200-800mm is still 500 € cheaper in the US including VAT…The prices are quite moderate (for Canon ).
For both FF zooms, I would have expected several hundred more.
Pricing in Germany (incl. VAT):
3.599,00 € for the RF 24-105mm F2.8L IS USM Z
2.499,00 € for the RF 200-800mm F6.3-9 IS USM
399,00 € for the RF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM
I must be the oddbird here, but I'm most interested in the new rf-s 10-18mm, the other two are out of my (justified) price range right now. 200-800 is still something to look after, and might be added to my collection some day.
Personally not interested in 24-105 F2.8.
Now I have to wait the reviews of the wonderfully compact, light and small rf-s 10-18mm. And I think it is really going to be very satisfying lens for me. Must be as good as ef-m 11-22, or better, right? And with a hood!! Wow!
Most Anti-Canon people is on YouTube. I see a few saying 35-150 is cheaper+better, digital correction is a sin for the 24-105LZ, f number is too small on RF200-800.The early comments on DPR are remarkably good - must still be bedtime for most of their trolls. 3 very impressive looking lenses - although as always the detailed reviews will tell the real story.
What prices are you referring to?And yet the 200-800mm is still 500 € cheaper in the US including VAT…
Why not just get the RF 16 f/2.8 or RF 15-30?I too am interested in picking up the 10-18mm. I shoot with an R5 and don’t own anything wider than 24mm. There has been an occasion or two where wider than 24mm would’ve been nice to have but I can’t bring myself to spend over a thousand dollars on a large zoom lens I’m going to use so infrequently. I’ll happy throw that small of a lens in my bag and accept crop mode for the rare occasion I want an UWA.
I calculated the VAT for Texas and the final price is 2.055 $. So with current exchange it 1.939 € in Texas.What prices are you referring to?
AFAIK the $1,899.00 are ex. VAT.
I was thinking 100-300 f/2.8 but that is an entirely different price range.RF 10-20, 24-105 and 100-500 might make another ultimate trinity kit.