Canon Patent Application: Hybrid Speedlite Cooling

Richard Cox
3 Min Read

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here's how it works.

In this patent application (2024-039230), Canon is looking at methods of cooling a hybrid speedlite capable of both continuous and flash lighting.

As with most speedlites in the modern era, heat is the biggest problem facing speedlites. The flash tube that outputs the light usually runs quite hot; this heat must go somewhere. As we make more of our camera equipment waterproof, or water ingress proof – dealing with the heat is always a major challenge.

Canon has patented several different cooling designs over the years, so that's not what I found quite novel about this patent application. What I found interesting is that Canon clearly shows a circular flash head. Now that could just be the illustrator since it's not mentioned if the flash head is circular, but more flashes are going that way, so it stands the reason that Canon is looking at jumping into that market as well.

Not to mention but Canon needs something sexy to get rid of the stench from the disastrous EL-1 release.

This seems to indicate a hybrid flash to me, but again, this is language translated and Japanese is not the easiest in the world to understand context.

 In particular, when shooting with a lighting device, there is a risk that the light source will stop emitting light due to an increase in temperature when using multi-flash, where the light source emits light repeatedly in a short period of time, or flat flash, where the light continues to emit light for a longer period of time than flash flash

Of particular note, it mentions two different distinct modes, one which is fast frames per second pulse flashing and the other is continuous. Both of these put an incredible strain on internal heat in the flash head.

It should be noted that this is a very conceptual patent application. There are no nitty-gritty details and exploded mechanical drawings showing the details of the flash. That is something I expect to see as an item gets further along in its development.

However, it could be that what Canon discusses here, they simply didn't need to show that much detail.

As with all patent applications, this is a look into Canon's research – it may or may not end up in an actual patent or product.

Japan Patent Application 2024-039230

Go to discussion...

Share This Article
Follow:
Richard has been using Canon cameras since the 1990s, with his first being the now legendary EOS-3. Since then, Richard has continued to use Canon cameras and now focuses mostly on the genre of infrared photography.

10 comments

  1. Interesting...

    Does this mean Canon will release even bigger Speedlites?
    ... Not to mention but Canon needs something sexy to get rid of the stench from the disastrous EL-1 release. ...
    Or just a quick redesign of the EL-1?
    🤔😉
  2. It'd be fantastic if they made a speedlite that actually functioned properly wirelessly. I have 5 EL1's right now that won't stay paired for more then 30 seconds [...]
    I suspect that any fixes in that area will break backward compatibility, or only work with future speedlites.
  3. Even people say that the EL-1 is a disaster, this is my main flash and is a beast in every way.
    My main complaint is the range of the wireless, 30 meters is so little and it should be increased!
  4. Even people say that the EL-1 is a disaster, this is my main flash and is a beast in every way.
    My main complaint is the range of the wireless, 30 meters is so little and it should be increased!
    It is a fantastic on-camera event flash.
  5. I suspect that any fixes in that area will break backward compatibility

    That depends if it is a design flaw and not some firmware bug. If they need to change frequencies, modulation or protocol it won't be backward compatible. IF the only need to improve the radio/data handling without such changes it could be.
  6. That depends if it is a design flaw and not some firmware bug. If they need to change frequencies, modulation or protocol it won't be backward compatible. IF the only need to improve the radio/data handling without such changes it could be.
    If it’s a firmware bug, you’d need to upgrade the speedlites, are those user updateable?
  7. If it’s a firmware bug, you’d need to upgrade the speedlites, are those user updateable?
    No, the big problem of Canon units is their firmware cannot be updated by the user - that's hard to understand. The recent release of the ST-3 v3 is a little incomprehensible, most competitors have units that can be upgraded, my Elinchrom remote is regularly updated to support new Elinchrom units (and fix issues), with no need to buy a new unit. I understand the need to sustain and increase profits - but not having system with software that cannot be upgraded in 2024. Unless it's an hardware upgrade, of course, because some components have reached end-of-life and new ones has to be used, but sometimes that's an internal change and it doesn't surface as a new version.
  8. With all the really good options in battery powered mono-light portables I've quit using my Speedlight's and moved to the FJ system. Even just handholding a 200 WS light is often easier for run and gun with more than enough power vs Speedlight's. I am sold on them for outdoor studio work.
  9. This was posted on Canons repair forum. Not mine, but just reposting.
    It's interesting but without analyzing the actual radio situation in that moment it's one empirical evidence. I routinely use Canon wireless in my home studio, where there is also a WiFi AP, without any issue. But I'm in a detached house and beyond my own WiFi other signals are quite weak. My APs are set to regulate the transmission power as needed, also, and that might help to avoid hampering the Canon signal. Also, wireless flash should not disrupt WiFi transmissions.

    A building with a lot of APs filling each and every channel, blasting at full power, the interference can be far worse. Still, being the 2.4GHz band an unlicensed one, interference must be expected, and any design should account for them. Wireless flash has the issue it has to be a real-time signal, with strict tolerances, unlike WiFi which can stand far higher latency. Maybe today using a different band is not a bad idea, since most devices moved to WiFi, although many now uses the 5 GHz band.

    Anyway, we don't know if it is a problem at the hardware level - the hardware enter a state when it loses the link and can't re-establish it until power cycled, or it's a software problem, the hardware still works correctly but the software is in a state when it cannot resume operations. The latter might be far simpler to fix than the former, although without software update capabilities Canon units can't be fixed that way.

    I hope Canon is working on new, more powerful units and they might need to exchange more data - requiring a protocol overhaul.

Leave a comment

Please log in to your forum account to comment