Canon Patent: RF 20mm F1.4 VCM, 21mm F1.4 VCM, 28mm F1.4 VCM

Richard Cox
2 Min Read

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here's how it works.

Canon released the RF 50mm f1.4L VCM, 24mm f/1.4L VCM, and 35mm f/1.4L VCM, and there have been hints that more is coming.

This patent application (2025-015010) shows the RF 24mm f/1.4L VCM. However, other embodiments may come out in the future. Interestingly, the same overall optical element design was used for the RF 35mm f/1.4L VCM, but it does not appear as an actual embodiment.

This patent application mentions explicitly that they wanted to make the lens with less focus breathing;

To provide an optical system that is compact yet has high optical performance by suppressing aberrations and fluctuations in the angle of view that occur during focusing.

Canon RF 20mm F1.4L VCM

Focal Length20.63
F-Number1.46
Angle of View42.73
Lens Length112.63
Back Focus Distance15.44

Canon RF 28mm f/1.4L VCM

Focal Length28.80
F-Number1.46
Angle of View33.89
Lens Length119.74
Back Focus Distance14.63

Canon 24mm f/1.4L VCM

This embodiment shows the actual production RF 24mm f/1.4L VCM lens.

Focal Length24.72 
F-Number1.46
Angle of View37.14 
Lens Length118.17 
Back Focus Distance15.18 

Canon RF 21mm f/1.4L VCM

Focal Length21.22
F-Number1.46
Angle of View41.03
Lens Length120.82
Back Focus Distance21.77

Canon 28mm f/1.4L VCM

Focal Length27.52
F-Number1.46
Angle of View34.12
Lens Length121.21
Back Focus Distance12.63

Canon 28mm f/1.4L VCM

Focal Length28.79
F-Number1.46
Angle of View32.90
Lens Length128.09
Back Focus Distance13.86

As with all patent applications, this is a look into Canon's research. While we know this patent application did show embodiments that made it into an actual release, other embodiments may or may not make it into actual products.

Source:Japan Patent Application 2025-015010

Go to discussion...

Share This Article
Follow:
Richard has been using Canon cameras since the 1990s, with his first being the now legendary EOS-3. Since then, Richard has continued to use Canon cameras and now focuses mostly on the genre of infrared photography.

16 comments

  1. Yeeees, yes, oh please yes 🙂 A RF 20mm F1.4 would be a sure buy for me, even though it is going to be expensive. And a RF28mm would make Craig super happy 🙂

    So, please let the next announcement of 1.4 lenses be for a 28mm and a 20mm lens. *fingerscrossed

    Edit: looking at the prices of the other VCM lenses here in Germany, the first try would be to rent the lens and then wait for rebates, cash back or refurb 🤣
  2. Interesting patent. Even though I purchased the 24 mm f1.4 VCM I might consider either the 28 mm or 21 mm. With that said, neither would be a priority for me. I am hopefully for some L-series telephoto zooms in 2025 or a 1:1 macro zoom.
  3. I would like to see a competitor to the 21mm Apo-Summicron SL - one stop faster, half the price, same image-quality. Can Canon you do it? 🙂
    Could they? Maybe. Leica's WA primes are hard to beat...
    But it would mean spending the same amount of time selecting elements, using more precision machined brass instead of castings or plastics, measuring, testing, most done by hand.
    Half the price seems a utopia.
  4. I would like to see a competitor to the 21mm Apo-Summicron SL - one stop faster, half the price, same image-quality. Can Canon you do it? 🙂
    If only they made it in RF mount!
    I'd rush to the next Leica Store...
    Presently I'm using the very good Zeiss 2,8/21 (EF mount).
  5. If only they made it in RF mount!
    I'd rush to the next Leica Store...
    Presently I'm using the very good Zeiss 2,8/21 (EF mount).
    M mount has a longer flange distance than RF, and Urth for instance have a matching adapter,
    but you probably have another reason why such a setup would not work for you?
  6. M mount has a longer flange distance than RF, and Urth for instance have a matching adapter,
    but you probably have another reason why such a setup would not work for you?
    No chance using a shorter M focal on an EOS R or sony.
    If the focal length is shorter than 35mm, you'll get some ugly color cast on the sides of the picture. You'd need a camera like the M, of course, or an SL with Leica's decoding adapter to get clean results. Even Panasonic's S series won't work with M lenses, despite it having the same bayonet as the SL.
    I've tested all my M lenses on the R and R5 II, 35mm and longer work perfectly. But 28mm and shorter, no chance!
  7. No chance using a shorter M focal on an EOS R or sony.
    If the focal length is shorter than 35mm, you'll get some ugly color cast on the sides of the picture. You'd need a camera like the M, of course, or an SL with Leica's decoding adapter to get clean results. Even Panasonic's S series won't work with M lenses, despite it having the same bayonet as the SL.
    I've tested all my M lenses on the R and R5 II, 35mm and longer work perfectly. But 28mm and shorter, no chance!
    When I first learned this, I wanted to cry, but men don't cry. Then I remembered an ex-girlfriend said, "You're not a man!" Cathartic release to say the least.

Leave a comment

Please log in to your forum account to comment