I think you can count on it. When it is released it will most likely have more MP. than the Z7.
Maybe not when it's just released, but in a time, it'll get more MPs growing. Because R may stand for Replicating pixels...
Upvote
0
I think you can count on it. When it is released it will most likely have more MP. than the Z7.
Don't neglect the crappy 4K implementation.That will come when it turns out that it only goes to ISO 512,000 and only 119 instead of 120 at 1080p.
And a rumored TWO models afoot... what might the next one be? If this is the EOS R .... might we finally see the EOS C ? Or perhaps EOS S (like the 1DS higher resolution models of yesteryear)
I'm jumping ship...........Sony to Canon. I'm not even trolling or a fan boy! Just waiting for the right Canon to get me back.OMG! Almost 100 posts without a single threat to jump ship.
Maybe not when it's just released, but in a time, it'll get more MPs growing. Because R may stand for Replicating pixels...
But will it make me a sandwich? I think that's the question we've really all been asking ourselves.
What strength ND? Variable ND? Likely not enough room to swing out a filter. A slot to remove/insert
For PL, shouldn’t it be called PL-C as is the case for the drop-in supertele CPLs?
But back up a step... M.ADAP R = either adapting an EF-M lens to the R body (is that even feasible, and with an APS-C image circle who would really want to, and even if so, why make three different versions of it?
No, more likely it’s to adapt R lenses to EOS M bodies. That makes sense for an upgrade path from APS-C to FF MILC, but it also means all these discussions of the video features of the new bodies benefiting from such an adapter are moot. The latter only applies if PL is for adapting PL mount lenses to the EOS R.
So we can buy the 28mp version, keep it watered and in the sun and in 6 months to a year it will mature in to a full fledged 50mp body?
When will they release the 100mm lens that we can grow to 500mm?
Do you really need a circular polarizer on a mirrorless camera with DPAF?For PL, shouldn’t it be called PL-C as is the case for the drop-in supertele CPLs?
Assuming they really have native EF mounting. If they don't these could be three adapters for EF lenses... one plain jane, one with ND, and one with a polarizer.Yes, these seem to be adapters to mount R lenses on other mounts. Everything points to EF lenses mounting directly on the new camera.
Maybe this is one of the reasons the 70-200 III only got coatings and a paint job. I can imagine developing all of this new gear over the last several years would take a lot of time and resources - it may have made more sense to just do a refresh of the 70-200 (considering how good it still is) when you're developing all of this behind the scene
Roger Cicala has a post on his tear down of the 70-200 F4 on the Lensrental site. It''s more than coatings and a paint job.Maybe this is one of the reasons the 70-200 III only got coatings and a paint job. I can imagine developing all of this new gear over the last several years would take a lot of time and resources - it may have made more sense to just do a refresh of the 70-200 (considering how good it still is) when you're developing all of this behind the scenes.
Interesting implications from that list.
The lack of an EF mount adapter strongly suggests the new camera will be able to natively mount EF lenses.
The lack of an IS designation on standard lenses suggests IBIS.
L USM lenses are consistent with a serious, high end offering.
No CR3 tag, so presumably this remains a rumor. If this rumor turns out to be true, there will be plenty of crow to be served on these forms.
These are all well known inventions, especially the one that helps the lens grow. As an example, there's lots of advertised pills on the web that help grow one's self-esteem. Surely the pills must be working or nobody would buy them.
Note however that the sensor wouldn't just grow in the sunlight. You'll have to feed it somehow.
Wow, this took me by surprise. If this holds true Canon goes into the mirrorless market heavy handed.
This camera must be really amazing if they think people will pay >1k $ for lenses for it. 28-70 F2 and 50 F1.2 are definitely not going to be typical prosumer lenses when it comes to price range.
Or it will come later so the price of early adoption will have to include at least one lens?
Sorry DSLR users, you need to buy a new camera to use the RF 28-70 f2.8 L zoom. Does that alienate the existing Canon users and set the stage for MLFF platform for Canon?
I'm jumping ship...........Sony to Canon. I'm not even trolling or a fan boy! Just waiting for the right Canon to get me back.