Review: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM

[Del Paso]

I definitely will buy it, as soon as I can afford it (could take a few-many? years), and combine it with a 16/35 and a tele zoom.
Its optical quality is a very convincing argument.
And, to be honest, all of us non-professionals do not NEED the lenses we buy. For most of us, photography is a hobby, and one of its pleasures is having-buying-using our little toys... Necessity is a justification valid for pros who earn a living with photo-gear.

 

[padam]

New review:
https://www.slrlounge.com/canon-rf-28-70-2-0l-a-hands-on-review/

 

[Ozarker]

I definitely will buy it, as soon as I can afford it (could take a few-many? years), and combine it with a 16/35 and a tele zoom.
Its optical quality is a very convincing argument.
And, to be honest, all of us non-professionals do not NEED the lenses we buy. For most of us, photography is a hobby, and one of its pleasures is having-buying-using our little toys... Necessity is a justification valid for pros who earn a living with photo-gear.

Speak for yourself. I need this lens bad.

 

[Kit Lens Jockey]

I know the original review is old at this point, but I am so damn tired of the line "This f2 zoom can replace a whole kit of primes." Yeah, except this zoom is still about a stop and a half slower than Canon's best primes.