If you do not saturate the photosites of your sensor. With enough DR you could map the tones to that result - or if you have the right display medium. OLED might be one step in the right direction if the OS of your computer delivers precise data to represent the brightness levels ... or micro LEDs (sub-mm anorganic LEDs) which are non-organic and burn-in-proof but expensive (now). They are state-of-the-art in cinema displays.
A LEDs photon flux can be changed between 10 photons per second up to 10^12 photons per second should be possible resulting in a DR of roughly ridculous 25 stops ... theoretically.
EDIT: 10^12 = 1 000 000 000 000 is a rough estimate
Nice to see SOMEBODY HERE knows their optics and math!
Anorganic LEDs require some serious CMOS etching technology over a wide area for large displays, and the only system that can print out very large area high dynamic range colour micro-LEDs for display purposes is from Heidelberg Instruments:
Large Area Volume Pattern Generators
VPG+ 800, VPG+ 1100 and VPG+ 1400
Heidelberg Instruments is a world-leading manufacturer of high precision maskless direct write lithography systems and nanofabrication tools.
www.himt.de
And we are talking about tens to hundreds of millions of dollars worth of layout and etching gear!
Price-wise, it's actually CHEAPER to recreate those now defunct Pioneer Plasma Displays (which I STILL HAVE!) which outperform even OLED screens in terms of black levels and colour brightness. I have a few of the Canon $34,000 IPS reference monitors and a high end Sony BVM-series OLED broadcast reference display and I still like my 1080p Pioneer Plasma displays BETTER!
The ONLY price-sensitive system that is coming out that can exceed OLED in terms of dynamic range and colour rendition are vertically stacked Boron Nitride Nanotubes which are rugged enough to withstand long-term photon emissions AND reception AND still have the RGB wavelength emissions repeatability which make for great colour rendition!
I've seen a Boron Nitride display and at 65+ inches horizontally at 1000+ dpi, it was the finest 16-bits per channel RGB display EVER CREATED !!!
Th only problem is a stacked nanotube display takes MONTHS to create just ONE of them using MEM's based stacking micro-instrumentation AND right now that one single display was literally 25 million dollars U.S. of RnD funding! That said, with the coming ability to GROW vertically stacked nanotubes like trees in mere weeks or even days coming online within two to four years, it will mean Millions-to-One contrast ratios for 1000+ DPI displays at sub-$5000 prices. AND since dopants can be ADDED to Boro-nitrides for photon RECEPTION, it means we can COMBINE a stacked RGB emissive display with in-between photo-receptors so that entire screens CAN ALSO BE CAMERAS !!!!!
Imagine an 8K display that has inter-twined RGB display pixels and RGB SENSOR pixels on one single substrate! No CMOS camera with complex optical pathways needed anymore! Just screens that have micro-lensed nanotubes EMITTING and RECEIVING RGB light wave at the same time! Your ENTIRE smartphone display IS ALSO THE CAMERA !!!
That would OBLITERATE the DSLR and MILC camera system market in one fell swoop since computational imaging techniques can then be used to manipulate the incoming photons as we see fit since the ENTIRE display is a giant image sensor in itself in addition to being a display system!