Hello. I am soon looking into buying either the EOS R, the R5 or the R6 (depending on the upcoming announcements). I am also going to buy a 24-70 lens, because it seems like a versatile tool to have (I only shoot stills).
I've heard many good things about the new RF lenses and would like to own the Canon RF 24-70mm f2.8 L IS USM lens, but it's quite expensive, so instead I am considering the Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD EF G2 lens (with the EF-RF mount adapter), which is significantly cheaper and seems to have many of the same qualities.
In fact, the Canon RF is almost twice as expensive as the Tamron!
(I know that there is also an Canon EF 24-70mm, but I want to have the image stabilization that both the Tamron and the new RF lens have.)
Does anyone have experience with both lenses --- and if so, do you think the Canon RF is worth twice the cost compared to the Tamron?
Thanks.
I've heard many good things about the new RF lenses and would like to own the Canon RF 24-70mm f2.8 L IS USM lens, but it's quite expensive, so instead I am considering the Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD EF G2 lens (with the EF-RF mount adapter), which is significantly cheaper and seems to have many of the same qualities.
In fact, the Canon RF is almost twice as expensive as the Tamron!
(I know that there is also an Canon EF 24-70mm, but I want to have the image stabilization that both the Tamron and the new RF lens have.)
Does anyone have experience with both lenses --- and if so, do you think the Canon RF is worth twice the cost compared to the Tamron?
Thanks.