Aussie shooter
https://brettguyphotography.picfair.com/
Well. I am comparing the R5 at 4000ISO to my 7d2 in the same situation as he has shot the cheetah in(poor light, underexposed). my 7d2 will give roughly the same results at ISO 800. So that puts the R5 at roughly 2.3? stops improvement over the 7d2. So if the R5 is way better than the R that would mean the R is only a stop or so better than a 7d2? I find that hard to believe so it is quite clear that someone is wrong. Whether it is me or you I could not say because I have not really spent time plating with files from the R or 5d4. I think we need input from those who have experience with the 7d2, the R(or 5d4) and the 1dx3. That is all that will clear this upYou guys just keep up your photon pseudoscience and completely ignore the examples you’re seeing. Makes no difference to me. I just showed how ISO 4K on the R5 blows away the R at ISO 1600, and the Private person just showed us how the R is just as good at ISO as the 1DX3, which you say is the same as the R6. But in the sample shots the R6 noise looks even better than the R5, so... Jeezus, you guys.
Upvote
0