Anybody own both of these lenses? In the process of converting from EF to RF.
I have had the old 24-105L F4, and currently have the EF 24-70L II.
Just trying to decide between the 2 for a mid range zoom.
I mainly shoot landscapes, so the RF 15-35 was the first one to get. I don't shoot in the 35-70 focal lengths much, and if I do its usually not wide open.
I've read the reviews, including the ones on The Digital Picture which are great. It seems like the differences between these are not that significant. Having said that, there is a reason one costs twice as much. From a cost perspective, it seems appealing to buy the 24-105 when it comes out as a kit with R5, and spend the difference on the RF 70-200L.
I am wondering if the differences in IQ would be much more apparent on a 45 MP sensor.
Cost is important but if I end up ditching the 24-105 for the 24-70 later then I would rather just get the 24-70 and be done.
Any input appreciated.
I have had the old 24-105L F4, and currently have the EF 24-70L II.
Just trying to decide between the 2 for a mid range zoom.
I mainly shoot landscapes, so the RF 15-35 was the first one to get. I don't shoot in the 35-70 focal lengths much, and if I do its usually not wide open.
I've read the reviews, including the ones on The Digital Picture which are great. It seems like the differences between these are not that significant. Having said that, there is a reason one costs twice as much. From a cost perspective, it seems appealing to buy the 24-105 when it comes out as a kit with R5, and spend the difference on the RF 70-200L.
I am wondering if the differences in IQ would be much more apparent on a 45 MP sensor.
Cost is important but if I end up ditching the 24-105 for the 24-70 later then I would rather just get the 24-70 and be done.
Any input appreciated.