so all this talk about superior RF glass goes out the window cause we cant use it now
Please let us know when and where exactly you're throwing your RF glass out of the window.
Upvote
0
so all this talk about superior RF glass goes out the window cause we cant use it now
they should, as they will do all the processingWill an atomos external recorder help with reducing the heat build up inside the camera body?
Why they just don't lead the heat to the bottom of the camera plate, where some hybrid grip could take over? It could contain less of a battery, plus cooling elements ...
Why they just don't lead the heat to the bottom of the camera plate, where some hybrid grip could take over? It could contain less of a battery, plus cooling elements ...
Do we know how this works? Is it a fan or some other active tech that we don't know about? Does it have it's own power supply?it sounds like pretty lame to me... with that air turbulent flow of air your sensor will get tons of dust per se, and then if it flows quick enough or in poorer weather with some fine particles you likely kill off your camera. plus it drains battery which the MILC don't have much on tab anyway, not to say just as a dozen of others said here you kills off the better RF lens being used for the camera to take great video
Me too!Please let us know when and where exactly you're throwing your RF glass out of the window.
Nooo.... it is a value added solution (extended video recording time). Like your Control ring or ND EF to RF adaptor.If the adaptor is purely for the heat issue, it should be free with the camera.
can you throw D1X mark3 my way as well?Me too!
Apple's moveso all this talk about superior RF glass goes out the window cause we cant use it now
they do, its call c300iii c500iiAn adapter is fine, but Canon should have designed this from the ground up for video.
Canon should have made the R5 far bigger so it could handle the heat better.
They should have included fans and a far bigger heatsink. While they were making it bigger to better handle the heat, they could have put in built in NDs to make life more convenient for the video shooter.
Oh and with a bigger body to handle the heat better, they could have also put more buttons on the body so that you could change key video settings without having to go in to the menu i.e. dedicated buttons for ISO / shutter / FPS / peaking / zebras etc.
With a bigger body they could have also then had full size HDMI and better audio input abilities e.g. dual XLRs and on-body control for the audio levels etc.
With a bigger body, they could also probably have managed to come up with a solution for swapping out lens mounts easily so YouTuber bloggers could switch between EF and PL mounts for their Vlogs.
Finally they could have had a bigger screen and also larger EVF to make working in video far easier. In fact, they probably just should have removed all the photography features and weather-sealing of the R5 because it's clearly just compromising the video side of the camera.
If only such a camera existed in Canon's range for people that want to do video....
its not meant to leave on the camera. It gets removed obviously. You mount the adapter well before the camera reaches its threshold for a certain time, remove it, continue recording.This is only a patent, not a product so far. Also, if they make one for RF glass, it will change the distance of the lens to the sensor, and I'm not sure that is possible or not.
While I guess it would be nice to have this cooling adapter one day, the R5 is a phenomenal and competitively priced stills camera with bonus video features as it stands today.
An adapter is fine, but Canon should have designed this from the ground up for video.
Canon should have made the R5 far bigger so it could handle the heat better.
They should have included fans and a far bigger heatsink. While they were making it bigger to better handle the heat, they could have put in built in NDs to make life more convenient for the video shooter.
Oh and with a bigger body to handle the heat better, they could have also put more buttons on the body so that you could change key video settings without having to go in to the menu i.e. dedicated buttons for ISO / shutter / FPS / peaking / zebras etc.
With a bigger body they could have also then had full size HDMI and better audio input abilities e.g. dual XLRs and on-body control for the audio levels etc.
With a bigger body, they could also probably have managed to come up with a solution for swapping out lens mounts easily so YouTuber bloggers could switch between EF and PL mounts for their Vlogs.
Finally they could have had a bigger screen and also larger EVF to make working in video far easier. In fact, they probably just should have removed all the photography features and weather-sealing of the R5 because it's clearly just compromising the video side of the camera.
If only such a camera existed in Canon's range for people that want to do video....
its an EF to RF adapter and used with EF lenses which is what cinematographers use anyway.so all this talk about superior RF glass goes out the window cause we cant use it now
Yes, if switched off permanently. /sCan an IBIS be used to help cooling a sensor?