• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Rumors are slow, let’s talk RF lens wish lists

all my desired lenses already exist or are already in the pipeline:
  • trinity of f/4 zooms
  • at least 1.4 fast primes in all varieties. Until then, the EF ones can always be adapted...

The only lens I am missing terribly in the EF lineup is a good 50, and the RF 50 1.2 fills that need just about exactly.

But if you ask for dreams:
  1. a bunch of 1.0 - or faster - primes: The classic focal lengths will do: 14, 24, 35, 50, 85
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Previously my most used lenses were:
  • MP-E65mm (macro)
  • EF100mm L (macro)
  • EF180mm L (macro)
  • EF85 f/1.8 (my kids)
  • EF-M32 f/1.4 (my kids)
Since a few weeks I have the RF100-500, which is great for dragonflies and the RF85 f/2 has been preordered at launch.

So what I'd like to see in RF is:
  • A long-ish stabilized 1:1 macro, e.g 200mm
  • A loooong stabilized 1:1 macro, e.g 400mm
  • A stabilized macro that can do up to 3:1 and focus to infinity, somewhere between 60 and 100mm. Preferably with a slot for the same rear filters as the EF-RF filter adapter, the flashes tend to be waaaaay in front of the lens causing flare and other internal reflections.
  • 50mm f/1.8 that works with the R5 IBIS to remove the rolling motion when I try to film my kids.
And not RF, but related:
  • A first party twin light flash that's a lot cheaper than the MT26-EX at €1300.
For 3:1 Macro if there is a limitation for AF beyond 1x even that would be a reasonable compromise for lens that would be easy to carry in field.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
15-35mm f2.8 IS is a great lens but it has huge vignetting. I understand that to keep the size small enough it was necessary but that high vignetting is extreme. Just look at Imaging Resource and Opticallimits reviews and you'll see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
all my desired lenses already exist or are already in the pipeline:
  • trinity of f/4 zooms
  • at least 1.4 fast primes in all varieties. Until then, the EF ones can always be adapted...

The only lens I am missing terribly in the EF lineup is a good 50, and the RF 50 1.2 fills that need just about exactly.

But if you ask for dreams:
  1. a bunch of 1.0 - or faster - primes: The classic focal lengths will do: 14, 24, 35, 50, 85
The f4 trinity is my desire as well. Always wanted to replace my 50 Compact macro, but I never cared for any of Canon’s 50s nor the 24-70 f4. Nikon has the exact lenses that I like except the 70-200 f4. Their 50 1.8 is outstanding.
 
Upvote 0
Nice to expect the 15-35 1:4 IS, but I would wait and see the roadmap for wide zooms fleshed out before committing, I have the EF 16-35 1:4 so I can wait. The fundamental question is whether the RF mount can deliver a 10-24, 12-24 or 12-28 that is significantly more compact while maintaining or improving quality compared to the rather bulky EF 11-24 (that I love). For the rest still waiting for my 100-500 on backorder, patents, announcements and rumors are great, but I would really like to actually put it on a camera :-)
 
Upvote 0