Search results

Thanks! I knew DxO had minimal support for JPG and HEIF which aren't RAW formats. They also don't have great support for scanner images in RAW formats either. No real surprise they haven't done RAW formats for phones.

When my S95 died, I replaced it with an S110 as my pocket camera. Still works fine, but I don't remember when I last used it. Wonder how it compares to my iPhone 15 Pro Max (3 lenses with 13, 48, and 120mm equivalents) which is much larger but similar weight. One benefit of a camera is that...

Spring has arrived and the ducks have returned to my backyard pond. Shot through an open door to minimize the disturbance. Haven't been shooting much the past year. Finally got a chance to try out the R7. R7, RF800, handheld, DxO PL5. Keeping an eye on me.

I find I like the background blur in the second images more than the first. It was less distracting for me.

Canon is playing the game differently. Here is Simon Sinek's view of an infinite player like Apple, which could just as easily be Canon. They are not chasing other companies' specs. There are interesting parallels with the other companies in the camera space.

Patent duration in Japan is 20 years. US patents are 17 years, but US will recognize international patents up to 20 years. I think they still have some time... :unsure:

El Santuario de Chimayo, Chimayo, New Mexico, January 2019 M5, EF-M 18-150

Hmmmmm. Taken another way, does this mean the fake/computational bokeh is actually a very good appoximation of the real/mechanical bokeh from glass, but it was just a bit ahead of its time? ;)

Use a mirror to get the camera and artwork in the same plane. When you center the camera in the mirror reflection you are perfectly aligned. You'll need a mirror large enough to align the center of the artwork. Highly recommend a macro like the 100L for this work - it did a great job for me...

This thread seems oddly familiar...

Always loved my FD 50 f1.4 back in the film days. But there was a much larger gap between fixed and zoom lenses at the time. I’m not sure a RF 50 f1.4 would get much love these days or spend time in my bag.

NASA might have a different viewpoint...

The word Canon is conspicuously missing from every image. I do see another logo on every piece of equipment, but no idea whose it is. It also doesn’t look like something that Canon (WW, Japan) would design IMHO. Here’s some PTZ cameras that Canon produces, most with a 1” sensor. It’s a...

There are some previous discussions of this and alternatives, such as: https://www.canonrumors.com/forum/threads/ef-m-55-200.32546/#post-663075

Cordilleran Flycatcher hatchling out of the nest. Guess we won’t be using the deck for a while. R7, RF100-400, DPP Express. Changed its pose and the light improved. R6, RF 100-400, DPP Express. Unfortunately, the deck ended before I reached MFD with the RF 800.

Cordilleran Flycatchers nested on our deck in Northern Idaho . Hatched overnight. R6, RF800, DPP Express. In the shadows so high ISO. DPP Express didn’t clean it up well. Will be interesting to see if DxO PL can do better.

Rufous hummingbird fledgling in Northern Idaho. Still didn’t quite have the hang of flying. An hour later it was bush hopping with a parent. EOS R7, RF 100-400, DPP Express.

A Spotted Towhee with a snack. R7, RF 100-400, DxO PL5.

Owlets on a breezy day. Two facing, one between them looking to the right. Still covered in fine down, hard to get any detail. R7, RF800.

The EF-M 55-200 might be the poorest and least used lens in my EF-M collection. Maybe they chose to improve on it.