• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Canon RF 20-50mm f/4L IS USM PZ Specifications

The 20-50 focal length is ideal for street photography. However, the lens is quite large for streetphotography, especially with the lens hood. It would be nice if Canon released a 35mm pancake f/2.8. This, in combination with the R8, seems great for street photography. The 28mm, on the other hand, is just a bit too wide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
It's close to the RF-S 15-60 or 20-60 f/4 I always wanted. 1:3 max magnification is too a great spec.
Would be a standard zoom for my R50 V and a good wide-to-normal for e.g. EOS RP.
Interesting lens - will wait for getting hands on that lens to check if it is really a good alternative ... I it can replace e.g. 2-4 lenses I own, then I will buy one!
 
Upvote 0
So it’s a fly-by-wire zoom.

A lens with three nano USM motors (two for zooming) and IS.

1:3 macro at 50mm, updated IS rated at 6 f-stops alone, L-series build quality with weather sealing, internal zooming.

Looks like it’s got the whole package!

Very cute, I just wonder how the power consumption will be, specially with cameras like the R8.

EDIT:
I'm absolutely speculating, but I suppose this lens may feature a new design, without a zooming helicoid. Being nano USM a type of linear motor, I suppose one zooming motor may operate one way, while the other motor does the job the opposite way, with both featuring positioning sensors. I suppose that could allow more combinations of positions for both zooming and focusing groups of lens elements, than traditional helicoid mechanisms.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
Really good weight. Very appealing.

I think I might personally prefer this over the 20mm f1.4 because I don't typically need the wide aperture at 20mm. It's great to have a normal range built-in to cover people shots while also allowing for 20mm landscapes, which is as wide as I ever like to go.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
The 20-50 focal length is ideal for street photography. However, the lens is quite large for streetphotography, especially with the lens hood. It would be nice if Canon released a 35mm pancake f/2.8. This, in combination with the R8, seems great for street photography. The 28mm, on the other hand, is just a bit too wide.
I agree. This lens is very appealing to me. I'd like to see more pancakes generally though....

28 is a bit wide for me too and 44 (apsc crop) often a bit narrow. Canon would make me very happy if they would just add a 1.3x crop raw option in camera, as then it would be a 28, 35 and ~44 all in one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
The 20-50 focal length is ideal for street photography. However, the lens is quite large for streetphotography, especially with the lens hood. It would be nice if Canon released a 35mm pancake f/2.8. This, in combination with the R8, seems great for street photography. The 28mm, on the other hand, is just a bit too wide.
This is an amazing lens for street photography, as a street photographer myself, I hope it is 20-60 like the Lumix kit zoom, however I like it has internal ZOOM which means it is not that big when we zoom in, which is not bad for SP. I am now consider it alongside the 28-70/2.8 for use of SP. Personally own the R50v and the PZ zoom kit lens, i love that lens for it's internal zooming capability.

Looking at the construction and comparing it to Sony's 20-70, I think this lens is build even more advanced compared to the Sony 20-70. The Canon uses more advanced glass elements compared to the Sony Lens.

If the price comes down in future, it is something I am eying on.
 
Upvote 0
All great specs, definitely interesting and useful. The only thing I am turned off by is the aperture. I wish it was 2.8 :( For indoor it might be a bit dark... Everything else is YAMMY!~ BTW was the 24-70 f2.8 supposed to have Mark2 version this year? Any rumors on it? :)
 
Upvote 0
Impressed. A definite buy for me for the following reasons 1) internal zooming, 2) covers a very useful range, 3) lightweight at less than 1 lb.
One question still is open: How good is it? I'll know it in a few weeks/months...
But I am quite confident, the RF L lenses didn't disappoint till now. I certainly do not expect an exception to this unwritten rule!
Mine will be used as an EDC and as a complement to the 70-200 in cities, hoping to be able to add a 14mm T/S in future.
 
Upvote 0
Not available yet here. There is a Canon 20-50mm lens available, but it’s the CN-E T2.4 version for $24K. I’ll wait a bit over two hours for the RF version.
I know, but I could place an order for it (or make a reservation) at KameraExpress, a Dutch company.
Since I expect longer delivery times , "or a "currently not available" I wanted to get it as soon as possible.
So I contacted their local store to be first on the list.
I WANT THIS LENS !!!!
 
Upvote 0