UPGRADING 7D to FF Please help!!!

[RLPhoto]

If you love the 7D, you'll hate the 5D2 or the 6D. Save the cash and get the mk3. It won't limit you later on.

 

[dvky]

in what way do you feel limited?

With the 7D I felt limited with the final image quality especially having to take most of the pictures late afternoon and continuing until night with no natural light.
Having seen the 7D prints and 5d mk iii prints, the 7D sure falls behind. Not that it's not usable, but I would like to deliver a better final product for the client.
Don't get me wrong, I love my 7D, it's fast burst and that extra reach is amazing but all I want to see is the FF capabilities and advantages over the crop sensor.

In the meantime, I don't think I'll be able to sell my EF-S glasses or the 7D due to my current location BUT I would still like to keep my 7D as my backup camera.

As for the 600RT, it depends on what your goal is. If you know you will be using wireless off camera flash, then it may make sense to get the radio flash. I don't have any experience with it though, as I used my 580 EX IIs and 2 430EX IIs with pocketwizard flex TT5s, and that's a fairly expensive and sometime finicky setup. So it really just depends on how you want to use your flash.

(PS. Wireless off camera flash is the way to go. Just sayin'. Once you start seeing how great your lighting can look with modifiers and the freedom to move your flash wherever you want without tripping over cords, you will soon have a case of lighting equipment upgraditis as well)

Thanks for your feedback, I guess I'll have to do more experimenting with flash and then see how it goes.

 

[iaind]

I already have a 5d2 and tried out both 6d and 5d3.
6d felt small 6xx size but performed well considering specs. 5d3 outshone it . Unless you need wifi or gps go for 5d3. I am awaiting arrival of mine c/w grip and 600rt.

 

[dvky]

I already have a 5d2 and tried out both 6d and 5d3.
6d felt small 6xx size but performed well considering specs. 5d3 outshone it . Unless you need wifi or gps go for 5d3. I am awaiting arrival of mine c/w grip and 600rt.

yeah WIFI and GPS aren't a game breaker for me. would be nice with it but can live without it and prefer the idea of dual card slots and being able to back up.

Thanks!

 

[bholliman]

I just pulled the trigger and purchased a 6D from Adorama. I also own a 7D and was looking for a FF upgrade, primarily for landscape and family shots around the house.

I was leaning toward a 5D3, but tried out both cameras at a local store and preferred the 6D's size and price. Since I plan to keep the 7D for sports and wildlife photography, fast shutter speed and lots of AF points are not high on my priority list. I actually perfer the simplified AF system on the 6D since i normally focus with the center point, lock and recompose my shots anyway. The remote control possibilities with a phone or iPad via wifi are a nice feature also. The money I saved with the 6D can be applied toward my next lens or accessory purchase.

Your decision may be different if you weigh the two cameras features differently. For me, the 6D is a really good fit.

 

[bycostello]

in what way do you feel limited?

With the 7D I felt limited with the final image quality especially having to take most of the pictures late afternoon and continuing until night with no natural light.
Having seen the 7D prints and 5d mk iii prints, the 7D sure falls behind. Not that it's not usable, but I would like to deliver a better final product for the client.
Don't get me wrong, I love my 7D, it's fast burst and that extra reach is amazing but all I want to see is the FF capabilities and advantages over the crop sensor.

In the meantime, I don't think I'll be able to sell my EF-S glasses or the 7D due to my current location BUT I would still like to keep my 7D as my backup camera.

so you are looking for iso performance, ff or crop is really irrelevant.

 

[dsporter]

I upgraded from the 7D to the 5D3 upon release of the 5D3 (paid the full $3499). I still have the 7D as well. I also have a mix of primes/zooms (100L macro, 85 1.8, 16-35L II, are my main lenses).

Since I was in almost the same boat you have, I think I can accurately diagnose your condition. You have what I have. Dx: Upgradeitis.

It works like this. You have the 7D. It's a wonderful camera. It takes great photos. But you see the posts where the full-frame has this out of this world image quality. And think of the true wide angle shots you would be able to get. And the ISO and low light performance.

Well the truth is . . . it's fun upgrading. The 5D3 is a GREAT camera, and I love it. However, if I were truly honest, I could have still done fine with the 7D. It's also a great camera. But upgradeitis is not curable. I don't think you'll be able to not upgrade without continually wondering whether your shots could have been more fantastic with the 5D3. So go ahead and do it and enjoy it and don't feel guilty. It's ok, many of us do it. And right now the price seems very good -- can't imagine it will go much lower for a long while.

Now, imagine the shots I could take with that 135 2L that's on sale for $900 . . . They talk about that buttery bokeh . . .

This is perhaps one of the greatest posts I've ever read in a forum. I'd like to share it with my wife so she'll understand my addiction to upgrading camera gear. I envy those photographers that hang on to their cameras until it quits on them...that's something I can't do.

I recently went from the 60D to the 6D and wasn't very happy with the AF being able to keep up with my kids. I tried fiddling with all the various settings and wasn't content with the results. I lost sleep over the thought of exchanging it for the 5D Mark III because of the difference in costs. I debated about waiting until the next 7D arrives or just picking up a 7D since they're so cheep now. Finally, after reading this thread I went back and got the Mark III. I could not be happier with the decision. The best part was I forgot about some gift certificates I had and was able to get the Mark III for only $2795. That was awesome.

 

[dickgrafixstop]

Equipment Acquisition Syndrome is a mental and a fiscal condition. If you're satisfied with the results
of the 7D and money's burning a hole in your pocket - buy glass. Full frame and crop frame really don't make a difference until you're printing 30X40 or bigger. I'd buy the 135F2L if I really had to
blow a thousand bucks, or the older 100 f2.8 macro and save the difference. The 24L might help or
the 35L if you want to go another $1500 or so - or for the price of both of them you could get your
5DIII - or either one of them an a backup 7D body - or wait a month or so and see what the 7DII
brings to the market. Nice thing about digital photography - the longer you wait the better your choices at any given dollar point.

 

[FatDaddyJones]

so you are looking for iso performance, ff or crop is really irrelevant.

Sure it's relevant. A full frame body is going to deliver better ISO performance than a crop, if you're comparing the bodies that he's looking at (6D and 5D3 vs 7D). It's this low light capability that convinced me to get the 5D Mark III, and not necessarily "upgrade" but add it to my kit alongside the 7D. Both are great camera and have their own respective uses. They're great together.

 

[nickorando]

If you love the 7D, you'll hate the 5D2 or the 6D.

Really? Remember what the OP wants the camera for:

"I'm trying to work in the industry of wedding and portrait photography mainly but on the side fashion"

The 5D II has been very successful in these areas, far more so than the 7D, and the 6D has the added strength of low-light AF that actually works - maybe even better than the Mk III. I love my 7D, but I love both the Mk II and the 6D a lot more!

Save the cash and get the mk3. It won't limit you later on.

I wouldn't necessarily argue against that, though.

 

[RLPhoto]

If you love the 7D, you'll hate the 5D2 or the 6D.

Really? Remember what the OP wants the camera for:

"I'm trying to work in the industry of wedding and portrait photography mainly but on the side fashion"

The 5D II has been very successful in these areas, far more so than the 7D, and the 6D has the added strength of low-light AF that actually works - maybe even better than the Mk III. I love my 7D, but I love both the Mk II and the 6D a lot more!

Save the cash and get the mk3. It won't limit you later on.

I wouldn't necessarily argue against that, though.

I also remember the biggest complaints from others and myself for just about any shooting was the AF. Unless of course, you like the 20D AF.

The 5D2 was only more successful because it was FF+resolution, and for no other reason. The 7D is a better camera and if you liked everything about the 7D, you find the 5D2 archaic.

 

[bdunbar79]

I cannot recommend the 7D for wedding photog. Get a 6D or 5D Mark III. Well, get a 5D Mark III if you can afford it.

 

[FatDaddyJones]

I cannot recommend the 7D for wedding photog. Get a 6D or 5D Mark III. Well, get a 5D Mark III if you can afford it.

As long as the lighting isn't too bad, the 7D does just fine. It's a great second camera, and you might just need that extra reach. I've shot a few weddings with my 7D, no problem. I know an awesome professional photographer that shoots exclusively with a Rebel XSI. It takes a lot more than megapixels and ISO performance to make a great photo.

 

[shtlens]

Ok, same question - I've had 7D for 2yrs+ and now I would like to go FF. At the moment I'm just hobbyist, so 5d3 is quite off my price range (though it's great body).

My main subject is portrait/fashion photography, so mainly still pictures, or with a little bit of movement. My main concern about 6D is the lack of AF-points sensitivity - only 1 cross-type in 6D vs. all 19 in 7D.

I use non-center af-points quite often as I use high-aperture lenses (50/1.4) and I don't want to loose my focus by recomposing image after focusing.

So is here anybody who really can compare AF on these two specific bodies?

 

[bdunbar79]

I cannot recommend the 7D for wedding photog. Get a 6D or 5D Mark III. Well, get a 5D Mark III if you can afford it.

As long as the lighting isn't too bad, the 7D does just fine. It's a great second camera, and you might just need that extra reach. I've shot a few weddings with my 7D, no problem. I know an awesome professional photographer that shoots exclusively with a Rebel XSI. It takes a lot more than megapixels and ISO performance to make a great photo.

Oh no, I wasn't saying it can't be done or people don't do it. It just is not my recommendation. I admit I have a lens selection that prohibits me from a reach problem, so I am able to shoot everything I do on FF.

 

[silversurfer96]

If it's within your budget, just go for 5D3 and don't look back. I have both, but 7D is getting less of the light now. I love the AF points on the 7D and couldn't settle with anything less, which completely ruled out 5D2 and 6D. 1DX is way out of my price point and would not even consider it until I have some type of photo businesss. That was my reasoning... Otherwise, I would have been completely satisfied with the 7D. You will have the best of both world. Just my two cents.

 

[BrandonKing96]

Just think about it.. if you use it at many gigs, the 5D mark III will basically pay itself off.