chmteacher said:What do you think?
unfocused said:chmteacher said:Everythingmostfive or six of you seem to be looking for is in the NX1 except Canon compatible lenses. Here's a comparison from thenewcamera.com. What do you think?
I think I corrected your post.
unfocused said:chmteacher said:Everythingmostfive or six of you seem to be looking for is in the NX1 except Canon compatible lenses. Here's a comparison from thenewcamera.com. What do you think?
I think I corrected your post.
chmteacher said:unfocused said:chmteacher said:Everythingmostfive or six of you seem to be looking for is in the NX1 except Canon compatible lenses. Here's a comparison from thenewcamera.com. What do you think?
I think I corrected your post.
Who wouldn't want greater FPS and AF points let alone wi-fi, ISO, etc.
jrista said:Since this thing uses ISOCELL, I suspect it should have very good color fidelity. Color bleed or crosstalk is one of the big issues with Canon cameras. Not for the same reason that ISOCELL was created...that was designed to fix a crosstalk problem due to BSI designs. Canon cameras use a very weak CFA, which allows less pure colors to be sensed by each color pixel. Same result in the end, though...more washed out color.
Which brings me to another thought...if this sensor is ISOCELL, then it's probably BSI. So Samsung has an APS-C sized BSI sensor design with ISOCELL? WOW...I guess that high end small form factor technology I'm often raving about is finally starting to trickle up the chain. If this puppy really is a large form factor BSI, then I'm very interested in seeing it's high ISO performance. I actually believe the 51200 is entirely possible, and high ISO IQ on the NX1 should be quite good.
I wonder if it's mount can be adapted to Canon EF lenses...
gerlesion said:28.2 Megapixel sensor with capability of shooting 15 frames per second. Faster than 1 DX. Is it fastest image sensor up to date?
3) The 7D line has been a bestseller in the enthusiast market for the past 5 years but the new model barely moves an inch forwards from the cheaper 70D. After such a long period of time was it Canon’s intention to position the 6D as the real 7D replacement and if so, how do you excuse such poor video quality on the 6D considering the enthusiasts it is aimed at? For video it is not a low end product but it performs like one.
http://www.eoshd.com/2014/09/10-questions-ill-asking-canon-nikon-photokina-join-present/