Don Haines said:And once again, it is a test of the sensor, not the camera.....
This makes as much sense as testing the motors in a Lamborghini and a F350 pickup truck and concluding that the Lamborghini will do a better job pulling a hay wagon out of a muddy field because it has a better engine.
The test here shows that the Nikon has the better sensor, so LABEL THE STORY AS "NIKON SENSOR IS BETTER"!, not that it is a better camera because that was not tested....
sometimes I have a hard time seeing the obviousahsanford said:Don Haines said:And once again, it is a test of the sensor, not the camera.....
This makes as much sense as testing the motors in a Lamborghini and a F350 pickup truck and concluding that the Lamborghini will do a better job pulling a hay wagon out of a muddy field because it has a better engine.
The test here shows that the Nikon has the better sensor, so LABEL THE STORY AS "NIKON SENSOR IS BETTER"!, not that it is a better camera because that was not tested....
We're all making fun of DXO here -- you understand that, right? I thought my thread title was a bit of a giveaway.
- A
Don Haines said:This makes as much sense as testing the motors in a Lamborghini and a F350 pickup truck and concluding that the Lamborghini will do a better job pulling a hay wagon...
and you can't put two canoes on the roof, gear and food for two weeks in the back, pick up three passengers, and head down a rough dirt road to the river.....neuroanatomist said:Don Haines said:This makes as much sense as testing the motors in a Lamborghini and a F350 pickup truck and concluding that the Lamborghini will do a better job pulling a hay wagon...
Well, maybe not a hay wagon...
![]()
Are you saying the sum of the parts isn't greater than the whole? How dare you question them? Just because you can't use the camera in a lot of situations and it's performance is lacking in others, doesn't mean it's not the greatest camera ever. DR at ISO 100 is all that matters!lintoni said:Damn, and DPReview have just proclaimed the Samsung NX1 as the ultimate mega APS king with whipped cream and cherries on top, despite the fact that the AF struggles in poor light... or unless you're using one of two lenses... or...
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/samsung-nx1?utm_campaign=internal-link&utm_source=reviews-latest-widget&utm_medium=image&ref=reviews-latest-widget
mackguyver said:DR at ISO 100 is all that matters!
The sun shines out of the backside of that camera! (At least, that's my understanding of BSI)mackguyver said:Are you saying the sum of the parts isn't greater than the whole? How dare you question them? Just because you can't use the camera in a lot of situations and it's performance is lacking in others, doesn't mean it's not the greatest camera ever. DR at ISO 100 is all that matters!lintoni said:Damn, and DPReview have just proclaimed the Samsung NX1 as the ultimate mega APS king with whipped cream and cherries on top, despite the fact that the AF struggles in poor light... or unless you're using one of two lenses... or...
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/samsung-nx1?utm_campaign=internal-link&utm_source=reviews-latest-widget&utm_medium=image&ref=reviews-latest-widget
Great one!!!lintoni said:The sun shines out of the backside of that camera! (At least, that's my understanding of BSI)mackguyver said:Are you saying the sum of the parts isn't greater than the whole? How dare you question them? Just because you can't use the camera in a lot of situations and it's performance is lacking in others, doesn't mean it's not the greatest camera ever. DR at ISO 100 is all that matters!lintoni said:Damn, and DPReview have just proclaimed the Samsung NX1 as the ultimate mega APS king with whipped cream and cherries on top, despite the fact that the AF struggles in poor light... or unless you're using one of two lenses... or...
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/samsung-nx1?utm_campaign=internal-link&utm_source=reviews-latest-widget&utm_medium=image&ref=reviews-latest-widget