it's kind of hard to believe it's a "typo" when the 1D Mark IV is actually called out like two lines above the 1Ds Mark IV
Upvote
0
RandomDude said:The reduction in height is problematic to me. The 1Ds III gained the extra 3mm over the MkII by using a larger pentaprism. It's possible that Canon found a way to squeeze the same viewfinder into a smaller bump, but it doesn't seem worth the effort. Certainly they wouldn't put a smaller viewfinder in the new camera.
WarStreet said:neuro, your current post count is 999, and I am curious to see if the 1000 post will switch your rank to 1dsIII maybe it is a sign !
neuroanatomist said:WarStreet said:neuro, your current post count is 999, and I am curious to see if the 1000 post will switch your rank to 1dsIII maybe it is a sign !
I guess we'll find out...right...NOW!
kubelik said:it's kind of hard to believe it's a "typo" when the 1D Mark IV is actually called out like two lines above the 1Ds Mark IV
neuroanatomist said:Maybe 1001 posts?
Nope... I guess the 1D IV remains the CR top of the heap. Does that put the kabash on a 1DsIV?
documentaryman said:If Nikon can announce two flagship models at once, I pray to God/Bhudda/Or Whomever Trips Your Trigger/ that Canon follows suit and pairs a 5D announcement with its new 1D.
dougkerr said:That entry does not now seem to be in that table at Gigapan.
Best regards,
Doug
neuroanatomist said:"Grasping at straws?" A typo is an inadvertant error of a minor nature. Adding a line to a tabuluR lisst of models is nit a typo, although this sentense is cleerly repleat with bona fide exampls. Now, if Canon had announced a 650D and they called it a 620D or listed its weight as 1640 g, that would be a typo. But, this was more significant, and calling it a typo is simply damage control. Does this mean Gigapan has prerelease specs of a forthcoming 1DsIV? Maybe. It could also be a complete fabrication to generate buzz for their company. But a simple typo? No.