• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

500 f4 L IS USM MK1

I found a 500 F4 L IS USM (Mk1) to euro3700 in excellent condition (with original plastic box and cover camo)
Is it a good lens?
I think this is the right choice especially by fitting it on EOS6D + 1,4III (becomes 5.6 and operates the autofocus)
The front/rear lenses are very clean, No powder inside and the paint is A++
I know that is heavy but I use it for photos from positioning.

Or should look for a MK2 used ?
The price difference is worth all the technical improvements of MK2?
I would like the opinion of those who have used them all and two, thanks
GPAOLO from Italy
 
This seems a great price for me.

The Mark 2 version is 0.8kg lighter, 3.7 kg instead of 4.5kg, which is a nice difference, especially handheld. Further the IS offeres 4 stops instead 2 stops assistence, wich means 4x longer shutter times handheld. IQ of the new lens is just fantastic, even with extender, but the Mark 1 should be excellent as well.

So, if you want shoot handheld i would stretch for a version 2 (which might be 2x the price) if you can, for use on tripod this offer seems to be great
 
Upvote 0
I like the Canon 500 F4 L IS (Mk1 or 2) very much indeed! However they are not ideal for my personal needs.

Whilst the Mk2 is significantly lighter either will get tiring to use hand held after a while so a good tripod and head (don't skimp here) must be factored into the cost. As a bare lens either will delight you - they are simply excellent. Where the Mk2 scores is with 1.4 Mk3 and 2 x Mk3 extenders. Whilst the Mk1 works very well with the 1.4 the 500 Mk2 auto focuses better and is a little sharper - you will have to pixel peep to tell but the Mk2 is better. With the 2 x extender it is more of the same with a little more advantage to the Mk2. The main difference to me is the weight where the Mk2 scores highly.

I cannot comment on the improved (?) IS as I do not use IS as I get sharper shots (down to fairly low shutter speeds) without it + I get faster AF lock and better tracking too.

I am not too up to date on prices but that sounds like a pretty good deal to me.

If the lens is as good as you say I think you will be very happy with it - now for a nice tripod and head to really break the bank!
 
Upvote 0