Just wondering if any 5d4 owners have tried a comparison of the regular AF vs AF using live view.
In a previous post, I noted that my first copy of the 5d4 had issues with the AF......specifically the regular AF was not working properly (ie not nearly as sharp as when I focused with live view, which was tack sharp each time).
Camera was on a tripod, shooting at my Spyder Lenscal AFMA target.
That camera went back (B and H returns work GREAT BTW, can honestly say you really will never have any problems with them), and I got another one.
So of course I tried the same comparison, using my 70-300L and my 100L macro.
This one works much better, there is very little if any difference between the 2 AF methods most of the time.
Using the 100L macro, there is no difference between regular af and live view af.
Using the 70-300L, the live view AF is a little better most of the time. But not anything like the other camera.
When using the live view AF, I was magnifying it before focusing.
I was wondering if one should expect the live view AF to be more accurate or not. Granted when using it I am magnifying it, and the 5D4 does have dual pixel live view af.
I was hoping some of our tech-savvy forum members would have an opinion on this, and if anybody else who has a 5d4 wants to try the test, I would love to hear your thoughts!
I suspect my original 5d4 had an issue with the af, but was surprised that the live view is always as good as, and even better that regular AF. maybe dual pixel is just that good.
Thanks for any help/info!
In a previous post, I noted that my first copy of the 5d4 had issues with the AF......specifically the regular AF was not working properly (ie not nearly as sharp as when I focused with live view, which was tack sharp each time).
Camera was on a tripod, shooting at my Spyder Lenscal AFMA target.
That camera went back (B and H returns work GREAT BTW, can honestly say you really will never have any problems with them), and I got another one.
So of course I tried the same comparison, using my 70-300L and my 100L macro.
This one works much better, there is very little if any difference between the 2 AF methods most of the time.
Using the 100L macro, there is no difference between regular af and live view af.
Using the 70-300L, the live view AF is a little better most of the time. But not anything like the other camera.
When using the live view AF, I was magnifying it before focusing.
I was wondering if one should expect the live view AF to be more accurate or not. Granted when using it I am magnifying it, and the 5D4 does have dual pixel live view af.
I was hoping some of our tech-savvy forum members would have an opinion on this, and if anybody else who has a 5d4 wants to try the test, I would love to hear your thoughts!
I suspect my original 5d4 had an issue with the af, but was surprised that the live view is always as good as, and even better that regular AF. maybe dual pixel is just that good.
Thanks for any help/info!