5dII vs 5DIII Studio shot

[brwphotoinc]

Processed using the Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 6.7 Release Candidate. Shot RAW. The 70-200mm is L series 2.8 IS version 1. The 24-105 is the kit lens that came with the 5dIII.

I am not sure the III is out performing the II at 50 ISO. The III seems to lack detail compared to the II.

Thoughts.

http://flic.kr/s/aHsjyGB8Ms

 

[dunkers]

Pixel peeping the flowers, I like the colors of the 5D3 better than your 5d2 shot.
The yellow in the 5d2 looks a little dull compared to the 5d3.


And there appears to be a little bit more detail in the 5d3 shot than the 5d2 shot on the flower in the bottom left. Look carefully at the yellow part and you'll see what I mean

 

[sweetcancer]

I am not sure the III is out performing the II at 50 ISO. The III seems to lack detail compared to the II.

This is what I'm seeing also, clear as day. I still hope that it is because of the raw converter, maybe even the release candidate of ACR is doing something wrong with the 5D3 raws? Canon dpp shows the 5d3 files way less detailed than 5d2 files, as you can see here: http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-III-DSLR-Camera-Review.aspx

 

[wickidwombat]

I am not sure the III is out performing the II at 50 ISO. The III seems to lack detail compared to the II.

This is what I'm seeing also, clear as day. I still hope that it is because of the raw converter, maybe even the release candidate of ACR is doing something wrong with the 5D3 raws? Canon dpp shows the 5d3 files way less detailed than 5d2 files, as you can see here: http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-III-DSLR-Camera-Review.aspx

the DPP preview is sharp its only once you start processing the detail disapears. The DPP preview is noticably sharper than ACR 6.7