I'm going through my periodic agonizing of trying to minimize my gear/maximize my greatness.
For indoor stage performances I've been using the Canon 85 1.8 and 200 2.8. The Canon 85 is GREAT outdoors and for portraits inside and out, but when there's brass instruments and indoor lighting (like with my son's jazz band) the purple can get way out of control. Lightroom helps, but I'd rather not have it in the first place.
So what of (on a Canon 70D) swapping out my Canon 85 1.8 for the new one from Tamron (or even waiting to see what Canon comes up with) or swapping out both lenses for a Canon 135 2.0? 135 wouldn't be a perfect focal length all the time, but would allow a lower ISO and be one less lens to mess with. I also use these outdoors which is where I think the 135 would actually be better (running events, etc.).
Thanks for your insight.
:-*
For indoor stage performances I've been using the Canon 85 1.8 and 200 2.8. The Canon 85 is GREAT outdoors and for portraits inside and out, but when there's brass instruments and indoor lighting (like with my son's jazz band) the purple can get way out of control. Lightroom helps, but I'd rather not have it in the first place.
So what of (on a Canon 70D) swapping out my Canon 85 1.8 for the new one from Tamron (or even waiting to see what Canon comes up with) or swapping out both lenses for a Canon 135 2.0? 135 wouldn't be a perfect focal length all the time, but would allow a lower ISO and be one less lens to mess with. I also use these outdoors which is where I think the 135 would actually be better (running events, etc.).
Thanks for your insight.
:-*