LuCoOc said:My guess is a 50mm 1.8 or 2.0 with IS and maybe a new 85 also with IS.
luoto said:Plus a change away from "white" to "black" lens...
ecka said:EF 35/1.2L
:![]()
Harry Muff said:Did the 200-400 have its own event, or was it part of something else?
Daniel Flather said:CarlMillerPhoto said:brad-man said:RLPhoto said:135mm f/1.8L IS USM
No. The upcoming announcement is from Canon, not Sigma![]()
lol. +1
Ya, it's Canon - they'll be releasing a135mm f/4 IS.
lolz. +2
kenny said:I'd probably enjoy seeing the 100-400 most. Though, I think Canon would be smart to compete in the 12/14-24 f/2.8 range.
Man, you are optimistic on price. Anyway, as the 200mm f/2L IS and 800mm f/5.6L IS look like bargains now in the supertele line, I'd bet on both of those being replaced with all the modern improvements of the other version II lenses, a matching paint color (those last-generation lenses look so outdated with different paint color /sarcasm) and an 'updated' MSRP.RGF said:replacement for the version II of the 300, 400, 500, and 600 with built-in 1.4 convertors (like the 200-400). Of course the price would jump by $2,000 per lens (ouch!)
CarlMillerPhoto said:brad-man said:RLPhoto said:135mm f/1.8L IS USM
No. The upcoming announcement is from Canon, not Sigma![]()
lol. +1
Ya, it's Canon - they'll be releasing a135mm f/4 IS.
I fully agree. The full frame body owners would say "buy EF lenses" because they think you will someday make the leap to full frame.Ruined said:Here is my guess:
EF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 IS $1499 - similar to the EF version in quality but smaller in size w/o weather sealing.
...to compliment an imminent 7D MKII announcement!
Might sound crazy, but it is the one major gap in the EF-S lens series and would be a huge seller w/ the 7D MKII and 70D.
Ruined said:Here is my guess:
EF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 IS $1499 - similar to the EF version in quality but smaller in size w/o weather sealing.
...to compliment an imminent 7D MKII announcement!
Might sound crazy, but it is the one major gap in the EF-S lens series and would be a huge seller w/ the 7D MKII and 70D.
In the past did Tokina 50-135mm f2.8 but no longer does. :'( Now only Sigma 50-150 F2.8 OS, which seems a good lens, but size and weight seem as large as 70-200 F2.8.candyman said:Ruined said:Here is my guess:
EF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 IS $1499 - similar to the EF version in quality but smaller in size w/o weather sealing.
...to compliment an imminent 7D MKII announcement!
Might sound crazy, but it is the one major gap in the EF-S lens series and would be a huge seller w/ the 7D MKII and 70D.
More thinking about a 55-135mm f/2.8 IS...
Ruined said:Here is my guess:
EF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 IS $1499 - similar to the EF version in quality but smaller in size w/o weather sealing.
...to compliment an imminent 7D MKII announcement!
Might sound crazy, but it is the one major gap in the EF-S lens series and would be a huge seller w/ the 7D MKII and 70D.