Somewhere the lines get blurred between enthusiast and pro. Photography isn't my full time work, but I do a good bit of it when opportunities arise. I do charge fees for most and some work I do in trade. That said, a 1DX is valuable to me for a healthy portion of what I do (dancers). I don't own one, but I rent it once per year when I absolutely need to have it. I MAY purchase a 1DX2 come next year, because I believe it will allow me to expand the amount of dance work I do. 14fps with killer AF is really invaluable there. I think sales over a few years would easily pay for the investment. That being said, I'm probably more exception than rule. There is still a large enough pro-only market for the 1DX regardless. And remember, Canon doesn't produce the 1DX in the same kinds of numbers it does a Rebel or even a 5D III. That makes the shared costs per unit higher and is in part why it has a higher retail price. Even if Canon produced them in numbers similar to a 5 body, the price of each unit might be, say, $6000 instead of $7000 (purely academic numbers here), but then Canon would have a glut of unsold stock because no matter what, the market for such a camera is only so big. Canon is a smart company and will produce according to the market it targets and the price will follow suit to cover costs and generate the profit margins they require.
stoneysnapper said:Its odd out of all the improvements listed and most of them I don't disagree with, that no one has mentioned the current 1Dx's biggest failing. The mirror box/shutter/lube splatter issue. It should go without saying that this will be fixed but given they wouldn't admit there was a problem in the first place will it?
IgotGASbadDude said:CanonFanBoy said:I wish there was a way for us to know, but I'd bet that the vast majority of 1DX cameras are owned by enthusiasts 40 years of age and over... "L" lenses too. That is where Canon's bread gets buttered. Pros are not the hull that keeps Canon afloat. Enthusiasts do that.
Count me in this category. 1DX owner, not a paid "professional", over 40 by ahem, a year or two :, own "L" lenses.
Wanted the equivalent top end bodies/lenses back in the film days but couldn't afford the best. Now, I find a way to get the best . . .
Re the above, I'm in this category too, nearer 50 than 40, almost all of my Lenses are L lenses and I use the camera for a broad range of subjects, not just large aperture work like sport or press work like a lot of pro's will. Shooting relatively regularly at F16 I need the Lube issue to be sorted, having pre-ordered the Mark I, I won't be ordering the Mark II until I know for sure it has.
Upvote
0