Announcement on January 8, 2013? New Lenses [CR1]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Phenix205 said:
Having been thinking about the 35 1.4 for a while, I was wondering how much time would the 35 1.4 owners shoot at f2 or wider? I shoot at wide open a lot except for the 50 1.4. Any info is appreciated.

My old 35L is perennially stuck at 1.4. Remember this is not a do-it-all lens if you are getting your feet wet... It is a great low light indoors lens in smallish spaces...it is also usable for traditional street photography. Indoors you usually know the subjects and you can jostle closer and they won't mind.

In large events or even for street my personal preference is actually for something longer so you can hang back and go for candid shots with out the camera in strangers' faces. With the 35L if you hang way too back you get those listless wide shots with tiny people doing too many things. Not too compelling. So you have to get a bit closer with 35L in general to have a coherent intimate theme... Outdoors or indoors. Much of my use for this lens has been indoors ambient light wide open. Performs like a champ!
 
Upvote 0
distant.star said:
.
How many aunts do they have?


Ray2021 said:
Great rouse to stem the sigma tide, but "end of march" will eventually become "delayed due to my aunt falling on her back till late July"

LOL ... If we go by the last few teles... And the "soon" to come integrated 1.4 extender offering ...I would guess they have an inexhaustible supply of aunts.
 
Upvote 0
Dylan777 said:
Ray2021 said:
There is a fly in the ointment ... Great rouse to stem the sigma tide, but "end of march" will eventually become "delayed due to my aunt falling on her back till July" ...then release 7 copies to keep the pot boiling and mass availability in November at the usual high initial price... This is not cynicism, this is what we have seen repeatedly in the past few release timeline with high end canon lenses.
Well practiced marketing strategy. :)

By x-mas of 2013, Canon offer $200ish rebate plus BH discount.....I see the delay as pro ;D

True, but they won't do that for a brand new product... Even with the 24-70 II, it is newish...but it has been around a few months before we saw the rebate.
 
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
criza said:
I don't think the old 35L will sell for more than it sells now used (max. 1100 USD).

Did you price the 24-70 MkI before the MkII vs. now? $900-1100 a few months ago, $1400 today. When the MkII came out, retailers immediately raised prices on remaining MkI stock to full MSRP (well above street price), and used prices followed suit. Same with the 70-200/2.8 IS, and it was about 2 years (i.e. beginning of this year) that used MkI prices returned to their pre-MkII levels. So I think it's quite probable the same will happen with the 35L...

+1

That has been the pattern for several years now.

I am wondering why Canon would be introducing expensive new lenses at that time. The worldwide econoomic situation, plus many people having to deal with bills from Christmas purchases doesn't sound right. Maybe it won't actually ship until 1915!
 
Upvote 0
jthomson said:
Need to wait and see if the 35mm beats the sigma.
As for the 14-24, too late I already sprung for the Tokina 16-28.

If the canon 35L II actually materializes (let's not forget, this is a rumor), canon will address or top the competition. Given the brand loyalty, they can sell the lens at a premium just for updating the old lens...sad, but such is life.
 
Upvote 0
Ray2021 said:
jthomson said:
Need to wait and see if the 35mm beats the sigma.
As for the 14-24, too late I already sprung for the Tokina 16-28.

If the canon 35L II actually materializes (let's not forget, this is a rumor), canon will address or top the competition. Given the brand loyalty, they can sell the lens at a premium just for updating the old lens...sad, but such is life.


Yes. Quality will not be the issue. Success will be determined by how much folks are willing to pay for the weather sealing and the red ring...
 
Upvote 0
brad-man said:
Ray2021 said:
jthomson said:
Need to wait and see if the 35mm beats the sigma.
As for the 14-24, too late I already sprung for the Tokina 16-28.

If the canon 35L II actually materializes (let's not forget, this is a rumor), canon will address or top the competition. Given the brand loyalty, they can sell the lens at a premium just for updating the old lens...sad, but such is life.


Yes. Quality will not be the issue. Success will be determined by how much folks are willing to pay for the weather sealing and the red ring...

Definitely there is huge crowd waiting for this lens.
 
Upvote 0
am interested to see, whether or not Canon can match the Nikkor 14-24 and the Sigma 35/1.4 ... at 2 or 3 times the prices that is ... har har!!

glad I have not moved to FF .. love my 10-22 and my 17-55 IS ..bought them DIRT cheap, hehe! ;D 8)
 
Upvote 0
ahsanford said:
Not buying this rumor -- especially for the 35. A new flagship L with less technology than its non-L counterpart?

The new 35L certainly will have IS.

- A

Zero chance of an IS ... Shouldn't expect IS for any of their L primes until you reach the tele range. 24L II, 50L, 85L II should tell you the story.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.