were you waiting for the 10-1000 F1.0 lens by any chance?
If it doesn’t have IS and dual card slots, count me out.
Upvote
0
Are these the 7 RF lenses Canon will be announcing in 2020? [CR1]
- Thread starter Canon Rumors
- Start date
If it doesn’t have IS and dual card slots, count me out.
A speedbooster doesn’t magically make a lens faster, it just optically diffracts the image behind the aperture to make it seem faster. And wider. The f/2.0 lens released so far, and its prospective trinity accompaniments, represent actual innovation and engineering. They’re big because that’s what it takes to gather that kind of light. I’ll take actual optics over parlor tricks any day.
Upvote
0
Truly. Although I'd prefer something just a bit longer like my cherished 100/2 EF USM. Adding 4 stops of IS is a dream come true.
Upvote
0
That would truly be delightful. The 35mm is a stellar performer at a great price plus having IS makes it such a useful lens for my shooting.
Upvote
0
Since the 35mm IS STM is around 500 and the optical forumula for the 50mm IS STM is very similar I'd expect it around the same price.
These lenses aren't going to be as cheap as their EF counterparts, given the fact that they are new optical designs.
These lenses aren't going to be as cheap as their EF counterparts, given the fact that they are new optical designs.
Upvote
0
Scarcely seems boring as the 70-135 f2 is not in anyone else’s line up. As for f2 not being much different then you would not be impressed by the 28-70f2 which in my experience was dramatically better than the 24-70 f2.8.
Upvote
0
I completely skipped over the 10-24. As an EF 11-24 owner I would snap that up in a minute. With the promise of the lenses listed here there is scant reason not to dump all my EF lenses and bodies and move entirely to RF.
With the R5 promising substantial improvements over the R I will be selling that also and getting 2 R5 bodies to complete the transition to the new mirrorless paradigm.
With the R5 promising substantial improvements over the R I will be selling that also and getting 2 R5 bodies to complete the transition to the new mirrorless paradigm.
Upvote
0
RF 50 f1.8 & 85 f1.8 at the same level as RF 35 1.8, well I'm sold for EOS R or new R6
In a nutshell companies lens offering make things easier to decide in terms of choosing ecosystem, Fuji XT4 looks promising but their lens options are limited and old.
In a nutshell companies lens offering make things easier to decide in terms of choosing ecosystem, Fuji XT4 looks promising but their lens options are limited and old.
Upvote
0
Bennymiata
Canon Rumors Premium
I was lusting over the RF16-35, but now the 10-24 looks like it will be the one to get me to retire my ef16-35 2.8LII.
Upvote
0
Rule556
I see no reason for recording the obvious. -Weston
I’m a 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM owner, and I love it. It’s a fantastic budget travel lens, and it compliments the current 24-105mm f/4L really well in a travel kit. I am upgrading to the RF 24-105 f/4L, and would love an RF version of the 70-300. Depending on the cost and size though, the Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM sounds really intriguing for my needs. If it’s still around f/5.6 at 300mm, and it’s $1,000 or less, I’ll be REALLY intrigued.
Upvote
0
Hopefully the missing MACRO designation is some typo - that would be the hammer lens for me combined with the RF 35 MACRO - or we have to wait another year for a RF f/2.0 100 IS Macro ?
Upvote
0
