I want a 135mm f/2L prime...
If the 70-135mm f/2 is gonna be as heavy as the 28-70 f/2 I am not interested.
If the 70-135mm f/2 is gonna be as heavy as the 28-70 f/2 I am not interested.
Upvote
0
Seems a little boring, given that Canon promised new and inventive lenses along with the R system.
The difference between f/2.8 and f/2 at 135mm isn't massive, and so that lens seems a little fringe.
Why no 17-55mm f/2.8? Why no telephoto lenses faster than f/7.1? Why no L primes smaller than their EF counterparts?
Did we really need a junky 24-105?
I want a 135mm f/2L prime...
If the 70-135mm f/2 is gonna be as heavy as the 28-70 f/2 I am not interested.
Not if that type of shooting isn't your gig. I don't have the need to own every mm of focal length, just what I like and utilize. No I'm not kidding. It will be wonderful for others no doubt.You are kidding right?
Difference of 10mm vs 16mm is massive. Clearly, 10 is a rather specialized focal length.
Seems a little boring, given that Canon promised new and inventive lenses along with the R system.
The difference between f/2.8 and f/2 at 135mm isn't massive, and so that lens seems a little fringe.
Why no 17-55mm f/2.8? Why no telephoto lenses faster than f/7.1? Why no L primes smaller than their EF counterparts?
Did we really need a junky 24-105?
No IS for the Canon RF 70-135mm f/2L USM? Seems strange...
My guess is that the 50 f1.8 and the 85mm f1.8 will be priced about the same as the 35 f1.8. The least expensive lens in the bunch will likely be the 24-105 f4-f7.1Indeed, but my concern is more that there's nothing on this list that will be cheap enough for some people, including those on this forum, who would like to move into the R ecosystem without spending a lot of money. IS drives up the cost, as I'm sure we all know, and I don't know how valuable it is in a 50mm 1.8 design that should, but is not guaranteed to, come in under $150.
With the new bodies coming out with IBIS... IS missing isn't a big deal anyway.Not strange at all: This lens is already MASSIVE without IS. With IS, this would be practically infeasible ...
LOL, I hope you were joking when you wrote 17-55mm...
19 mm difference in bokeh ball sizes is quite massive, I'd say.
What???
The diff between f/2.8 and f/2 is ONE STOP.
What is ONE STOP? -> 100% more light (2 X) !