I read somewhere that a Canon 7d isn't weather sealed without a Canon battery grip. Is it ONLY a Canon battery grip that is weather sealed or are there off brands with the weather sealing. I don't really think I need the extra battery power, but it might be worth the money to help protect my investment if it's the difference between a working and non working camera. I mostly shoot wildlife btw, and spent the extra money for the weather sealed 70-200 IS ii USM. I also have a hoya 77mm Cir Pul filter for the same reason.
Battery grip/weather sealing qyestion
- Thread starter stilscream
- Start date
- Status
L
Loswr
Guest
Sorry, you read wrong. The grip isn't required for sealing. In fact, the opposite - the body has reasonable sealing, the grip itself has some sealing, but there is no sealing where the grip attaches to the body (only gravity keeps water from from flowing up into the battery compartment.
Upvote
0
unfocused
Photos/Photo Book Reviews: www.thecuriouseye.com
Neuro is correct, but I think there can still be some advantage to the battery grip in terms of weather sealing.
I recall a post from a photographer showing a gripped 7D sitting directly on some snow in Antarctica. His attitude, which made sense to me, was that if you need to shoot very low (like setting the camera on the ground) the battery grip does offer a bit of a cushion against snow or dirt (within reason).
Plus, it is cheaper to replace the battery grip than the camera. However, I think that if I were going to be shooting under such conditions, I'd probably try to seal the grip to the camera with something like gaffer's or duct tape in hopes of keeping moisture out of the camera's battery compartment.
I have learned from personal experience that if you trip and fall, you'd rather have the camera land on the battery grip than in any other position. (I had to send the grip in for repair, but camera and lens were undamaged.)
I recall a post from a photographer showing a gripped 7D sitting directly on some snow in Antarctica. His attitude, which made sense to me, was that if you need to shoot very low (like setting the camera on the ground) the battery grip does offer a bit of a cushion against snow or dirt (within reason).
Plus, it is cheaper to replace the battery grip than the camera. However, I think that if I were going to be shooting under such conditions, I'd probably try to seal the grip to the camera with something like gaffer's or duct tape in hopes of keeping moisture out of the camera's battery compartment.
I have learned from personal experience that if you trip and fall, you'd rather have the camera land on the battery grip than in any other position. (I had to send the grip in for repair, but camera and lens were undamaged.)
Upvote
0
Never tried it myself but I see no reason why one won't be able to add a little bit of homemade sealing by gluing a thin sheet of rubber or EVA to the top surface of the grip.
Upvote
0
L
Loswr
Guest
CanonGuy said:
Really? So...you'd be perfectly happy if the roof of your house was 'pretty much 95% sealed' because if 5% of it leaks, that's ok? The only unsealed part is the plug? Whew, that's a relief, because there's probably no need for sealing of an electrical contact that provides power to the camera, sure, seal everything else, but let water and electricity mix, they play so nicely together. That's like saying it's best if the hole in your roof is right over your fuse box. :
Seriously, though, I think this is a design flaw on Canon's part. When I remove the grip (yes, the Canon BG-E7) where the battery compartment opening connects to the grip is just plastic on plastic. The battery compartment does have sealing, but the foam-rubber seal is on the battery door itself, and of course that's removed and stored in the slot on the grip when the grip is installed, meaning no effective sealing. Canon could have replicated the foam-rubber seal on the grip, but they didn't.
FWIW, when I go out in the rain with the 7D, I remove the grip. That's especailly important if the camera is being carried upside down (e.g. from a Blackrapid strap), since water would flow down the camera and in between the grip and body, then flow down into the battery compartment when the camera was turned over.
Upvote
0
D_Rochat said:
I love the extra grip area when using a large lens like the 70-200 f/2.8L. It makes all the difference in the world (er, well, all the difference between a sore hand and a not so sore hand at the end of a 6 hour event shoot). The extra battery life comes in handy, too - one less thing to worry about.
Upvote
0
R
Ryusui
Guest
Are you kidding me?!?neuroanatomist said:Really? So...you'd be perfectly happy if the roof of your house was 'pretty much 95% sealed' because if 5% of it leaks, that's ok? The only unsealed part is the plug? Whew, that's a relief, because there's probably no need for sealing of an electrical contact that provides power to the camera, sure, seal everything else, but let water and electricity mix, they play so nicely together. That's like saying it's best if the hole in your roof is right over your fuse box. :
Seriously, though, I think this is a design flaw on Canon's part. When I remove the grip (yes, the Canon BG-E7) where the battery compartment opening connects to the grip is just plastic on plastic. The battery compartment does have sealing, but the foam-rubber seal is on the battery door itself, and of course that's removed and stored in the slot on the grip when the grip is installed, meaning no effective sealing. Canon could have replicated the foam-rubber seal on the grip, but they didn't.
FWIW, when I go out in the rain with the 7D, I remove the grip. That's especailly important if the camera is being carried upside down (e.g. from a Blackrapid strap), since water would flow down the camera and in between the grip and body, then flow down into the battery compartment when the camera was turned over.
Just put some of this stuff around the base where the camera and grip connect and you're all set!
Flex Seal Reviews | Buy One Get One Free Today
;D
Upvote
0
- Status
