Buying a EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

Feb 22, 2012
63
0
5,171
I'm seeing the Mark 1 version of the EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM lens on Ebay and some other places in the $500'ish range

This seems like a pretty good deal, since the Mark 2 just came out.

What's the general impression people have of this lens? Good Stuff? or No?
 
Soft towards the edges brand new, good but not great AF. Who knows whether the AF of a used, possibly very old lens will work more than a few weeks after you buy it.

I had one, used it for several years in Asia, then a few more in America. It was good for its time back in the early to mid-2000's, but now, I think you could do better spending a little more and getting a 24-105mm new, if your budget keeps you in the $1k or slightly under range.

Or, save up, get a new version of the 24-70mm 2.8 (II)! Stunningly better than the old one.
 
Upvote 0
Plan on sending a used lens to Canon for a ~ $400 repair, there are some things that many owners are not aware of that makes the AF unreliable. Then, you should have a good lens, but none of the five I had impressed me, so I sold them all.

Watch for deals on the MK II, its visibly better.
 
Upvote 0
You won`t find one of this lens in the $500'ish range unless it is `for parts or repair` or it is the older model EF28 70 F2.8L.

The average price on the Ebay is 1K. I just sold mine locally on CL for $880.
 
Upvote 0
If I only had $500 to spend on a used possibly broken 24-70mm f2.8f I would buy the Tamron 28-75f2.8 for less. If I had $1000 to buy a used Canon 24-70f2.8f L I would buy the Tamron 24-70 VC for a little more.

I would either save for a Canon 24-70 f2.8 L II or buy the Tamron 24-70 VC. Both are better than a mark I 24-7f2.8 L according to everything I have seen and read. The Mark II is simply better by all accounts. The Tamron 24-70 VC, is at least as sharp (probably more) and offers IS.
 
Upvote 0