Can the new 7d mark ii challenge the 1d mark iv?

Mt Spokane Photography said:
Its a great time to buy a 1D MK IV. Its a much better camera, and prices will rise once the hype over the 7D MK II settles in.

I bought my 1D MK IV when prices dropped below $3,000 with the 1DX announcement. Unfortunately, I developed Carpal Tunnel in both hands and had to sell it. By that time, the dust had settled after the 1DX announcement and I sold it for over $4,000. I've seen that happen many times over the years.

Eventually, of course, prices drop, but look at 5D MK II prices after so many years, they are still higher than I would expect.

I've been considering grabbing another 1D MK IV, but if we see another high end FF body announced, that might just depress prices further, so I'll wait.
 
Upvote 0
The 1D mark iv is a strange beast with it's APS-H sensor. That may be why it went up in price a few months after the 1Dx was introduce. People that wanted more reach had no real choice. The original 7D couldn't compete with the picture quality of the 1D mark iv and the 1Dx got them further to the suject. Buying longer lens is an expensive solution.

If the 7D mark ii can match the 1D mark iv at high iso there is no reason for the 1D mark iv to sell at higher price. imo.
 
Upvote 0
The 7d2 has twice e megapixels for the same field of view allowing you to crop a lot more. I owned the 1d4 and sold it for a 5d3. I think the 7d2 is be just as good as the 1d4 (from a performance view) but so far to my eyes the images look a little cleaner even at high ISO....
 
Upvote 0
Canon1 said:
The 7d2 has twice e megapixels for the same field of view allowing you to crop a lot more.

So far I don't see that statement holding up.
So far my experience has been that the 1D IV can take heavy cropping. The 7D II far less.
At equal distances in real life shooting there is a small amount of resolution gain on same FOV pics shot with the same lens at the same distance. You have to pixel peep hard to see it,

It is about the same as the old 7D vs 5D II debate.
So far the it appears to be headed toward the same conclusion.
 
Upvote 0
takesome1 said:
Canon1 said:
The 7d2 has twice e megapixels for the same field of view allowing you to crop a lot more.

So far I don't see that statement holding up.
So far my experience has been that the 1D IV can take heavy cropping. The 7D II far less.
At equal distances in real life shooting there is a small amount of resolution gain on same FOV pics shot with the same lens at the same distance. You have to pixel peep hard to see it,

It is about the same as the old 7D vs 5D II debate.
So far the it appears to be headed toward the same conclusion.

Except that the old 7d is junk while the 5d2 is pretty good. The 1d4 is great and the 7d2 is looking like this as well.

I've been shooting my 5d3 side by side with 7d2 for several days now and the 7d2 is performing very well. Better than my 1d4 and at equal distance to the 1d4 with same lenses i can crop much heavier. The 1d4 had too much color noise and low shadow detail. The 7d2 is much more recoverable and the banding noise is all but non-existent. It's not just the raw file at a glance that is the only factor, it's what you can do with that raw file that really counts. No one buys raw files to hang on the wall.
 
Upvote 0
Canon1 said:
takesome1 said:
Canon1 said:
The 7d2 has twice e megapixels for the same field of view allowing you to crop a lot more.

So far I don't see that statement holding up.
So far my experience has been that the 1D IV can take heavy cropping. The 7D II far less.
At equal distances in real life shooting there is a small amount of resolution gain on same FOV pics shot with the same lens at the same distance. You have to pixel peep hard to see it,

It is about the same as the old 7D vs 5D II debate.
So far the it appears to be headed toward the same conclusion.

Except that the old 7d is junk while the 5d2 is pretty good. The 1d4 is great and the 7d2 is looking like this as well.

I've been shooting my 5d3 side by side with 7d2 for several days now and the 7d2 is performing very well. Better than my 1d4 and at equal distance to the 1d4 with same lenses i can crop much heavier. The 1d4 had too much color noise and low shadow detail. The 7d2 is much more recoverable and the banding noise is all but non-existent. It's not just the raw file at a glance that is the only factor, it's what you can do with that raw file that really counts. No one buys raw files to hang on the wall.

I have been shooting the 7D II side by side with the 1D IV for several days now.
What you are saying is not what I am seeing.
 
Upvote 0
bgosselin said:
The 1D mark iv is a strange beast with it's APS-H sensor. That may be why it went up in price a few months after the 1Dx was introduce. People that wanted more reach had no real choice. The original 7D couldn't compete with the picture quality of the 1D mark iv and the 1Dx got them further to the suject. Buying longer lens is an expensive solution.

If the 7D mark ii can match the 1D mark iv at high iso there is no reason for the 1D mark iv to sell at higher price. imo.

I tend to concur bgosselin. Mt Spokane, you may be correct that 1D IV will rollercoaster a bit but I think it's unlikely. I think the excitement over the 7D Mark II is more than just hype and it brings a great deal to the table.

Breaking it down, I tend to see the advantages/disadvantages thusly:

Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Pretty much even money. The LensRentals teardown of the 7D2 certainly indicates Canon really stepped up their game with this camera--surprising considering the price! Caveat, the 1DIV is probably more sealed than the 7D2 with grip attached.

Shutter Durability: Win for the 1DIV at 400,000. 7D2 is no slouch either at 200,000, but this is a win for the 1DIV. Caveat: A brand new 7D2 has its full shutter life ahead of it, whereas a second-hand 1DIV will only have a portion and how many cycles it already has will be a major factor.

AF: 65 all cross type for the 7D2 vs 45 with 39 cross type for the 1DIV seems to lean rather heavily in the 7D2's favour and that's without taking into account its iTR (see below under metering). In addition, the 7D2's points cover a larger portion of the frame. Of more importance perhaps than the bare bones of the AF systems is the fact that the 7D2 AF system is brand new and that Canon has worked very hard to ensure it is a state of the art system that borrows heavily from the advanced systems developed for the 1DX (and 5D3). When LensRentals did their AF comparison test of Canon cameras AF systems, the new systems found in the 1DX and 5D3 showed very significant improvements in hit rate and it seems reasonable that these advantages have carried over to the 7D2 and most reports seem to support that the AF system is the camera's crown jewel. Note, the test in question may be found here: http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/08/autofocus-reality-part-3b-canon-cameras. Obviously it doesn't include the 7D2 since it is a couple of years old--it's included to show the progression of Canon AF technology.

Metering: Huge advantage to the 7D2 with its new 150,000 pixel metering system, which should give much more accurate exposure under difficult conditions. (On the missed opportunity side, I'm not sure why Canon didn't provide AF point triggered spot metering!!!) The new metering system, in conjunction with the iTR ought to give the new AF system a huge advantage.

IQ: Still the biggest unanswered question. We are seeing many great shots with the 7D2, but until we see a 'shootout' between the two cameras it's pretty much speculative. Some seem to think they see an advantage to the 7D2 and others to the 1DIV, which means the results may be rather close to one another. (The AF advantages or disadvantages will also remain speculative for that matter, until there is a direct comparison by a competent reviewer. That being said, I respect Arthur Morris immensely and he seems very impressed with the 7D2 from an AF and IQ standpoint!)

Frame Rate and Buffer: Essentially equal.

Battery Performance: Favours the 1DIV--unless you get the grip for the 7D2!

In Conclusion: I think these two cameras are going to be very well matched against each other in terms of overall IQ and performance. I think technology is going to give the 7D2 advantages (some slight, others possibly more substantial). In effect, just as the 70D brought the xxD series to the same level as the original 7D, I think the 7D2 has essentially brought the top of the line APS-C camera pretty well level with the top of the line old APS-H camera. Just as there were caveats with the 70D vs 7D1 being "level" (which I will not go into here!) there are caveats with the 7D2 and the 1DIV being "level." But I think it's the essential reality and I think that's why the 1DIV price drop will essentially level off to the same approximate price as the 7D2 (or possibly lower!). Only time (and some side by side comparisons!) will tell.

On a side note, sorry to hear about your carpal tunnel Mt Spokane. :( I'm getting up there too, and I'm always afraid some ailment or another will prevent me from carrying the gear I want to use. I already have the "willingness" groan from time to time.
 
Upvote 0
takesome1 said:
Canon1 said:
takesome1 said:
Canon1 said:
The 7d2 has twice e megapixels for the same field of view allowing you to crop a lot more.

So far I don't see that statement holding up.
So far my experience has been that the 1D IV can take heavy cropping. The 7D II far less.
At equal distances in real life shooting there is a small amount of resolution gain on same FOV pics shot with the same lens at the same distance. You have to pixel peep hard to see it,

It is about the same as the old 7D vs 5D II debate.
So far the it appears to be headed toward the same conclusion.

Except that the old 7d is junk while the 5d2 is pretty good. The 1d4 is great and the 7d2 is looking like this as well.

I've been shooting my 5d3 side by side with 7d2 for several days now and the 7d2 is performing very well. Better than my 1d4 and at equal distance to the 1d4 with same lenses i can crop much heavier. The 1d4 had too much color noise and low shadow detail. The 7d2 is much more recoverable and the banding noise is all but non-existent. It's not just the raw file at a glance that is the only factor, it's what you can do with that raw file that really counts. No one buys raw files to hang on the wall.

I have been shooting the 7D II side by side with the 1D IV for several days now.
What you are saying is not what I am seeing.

Glad to see two people comparing the 7D2 and 1DIV--even with very differing conclusions.
 
Upvote 0
Apparently great minds think alike, because I've been researching this topic over the last few days. Unfortunately, I may have reached an even more expensive solution. If a 1D4 sells for $2,000 USD on ebay, and I can sell my 5D3 for $2,500, why not just put the money from the sale of the 5D3 toward a 1DX ;D?

Scenario A) If I keep the 5D3 and buy at 1D4, I'm out $2,000 total.

Scenario B) If I put the $2,500 from the sale of the 5D3 toward a $6,000 1DX, then I'm out $3,500 total.

The price difference between each scenario is $1,500, which isn't exactly insignificant, but we're approaching the end of the year and I could use a big tax write-off :o

I have a buddy approaching a million clicks on his 5D2 that's in the market for a 5D3, so I wouldn't even have to monkey around with ebay ;D
 
Upvote 0
I have been thinking the same thing. But here is a few reasons why I think a second body would be better for me.

I take pictures of soccer games mostly. The big field make me far from the action sometime. With my 5D mark iii I crop often to get closer from the action. The 1Dx won't help me there.

During winter time they play inside in a very bad lighting field. I need to shoot wide open. I bought a Canon 200mm f1.8 and even full open with speed at 1/400 second my iso stay between 3200 and 6400. So an extender won't cut it. I don't have that problem in summer time except during fall when the sun set too early. A 1.6 or 1.3 crop body would make it possible to shoot wide open and getting closer to the action.

My lens is fix. So when action is close to me I can't get it. With a second body I could use a wider lens and shoot the action close to me.

When I switch from my old 7D to my 5D mark III the Bokeh was one of the feature that I liked the most with the FF.

I'm afraid that I won't get it as much with the 7D mark II. The 1D mark iv could give me an image that is more pleasing to me.

Review on the 7D mark ii are very good and I think the image quality in jpeg will be good enough for me. I don't do huge print. It's mostly club website or small print for other parents.
 
Upvote 0
coreyhkh said:
I have both cameras and love the mkiv but its AF is not really up to snuff especially with 1.4 on a 500mm it struggles. For fast action the 7d will be my number one choice.

That's hard for me to believe since I use the 1D4 with a 300+2x TC all the time with no issues. Its a little slower, sure, but that's the electronics in the TC not the camera's AF system. I get that the 7DII (and 1DX/5DIII) have a more advanced AF system but its hard for me to imagine how big an effect it can really have since the AF on the 1D4 is already amazing. I'm going to have to rent a 7DII in a bit when I've got some free time to really evaluate it and see if the AF upgrade makes a big enough difference to be worth saving up for.
 
Upvote 0
Steve said:
coreyhkh said:
I have both cameras and love the mkiv but its AF is not really up to snuff especially with 1.4 on a 500mm it struggles. For fast action the 7d will be my number one choice.

That's hard for me to believe since I use the 1D4 with a 300+2x TC all the time with no issues. Its a little slower, sure, but that's the electronics in the TC not the camera's AF system. I get that the 7DII (and 1DX/5DIII) have a more advanced AF system but its hard for me to imagine how big an effect it can really have since the AF on the 1D4 is already amazing. I'm going to have to rent a 7DII in a bit when I've got some free time to really evaluate it and see if the AF upgrade makes a big enough difference to be worth saving up for.

The 1dmkiv has very few focus points that are cross type that work at f5.6 and only the center is cross type at F4, the difference is night and day and the 7Dmkii has the best AF system I have used!
 
Upvote 0
coreyhkh said:
Steve said:
coreyhkh said:
I have both cameras and love the mkiv but its AF is not really up to snuff especially with 1.4 on a 500mm it struggles. For fast action the 7d will be my number one choice.

That's hard for me to believe since I use the 1D4 with a 300+2x TC all the time with no issues. Its a little slower, sure, but that's the electronics in the TC not the camera's AF system. I get that the 7DII (and 1DX/5DIII) have a more advanced AF system but its hard for me to imagine how big an effect it can really have since the AF on the 1D4 is already amazing. I'm going to have to rent a 7DII in a bit when I've got some free time to really evaluate it and see if the AF upgrade makes a big enough difference to be worth saving up for.

The 1dmkiv has very very focus points that are cross type that work at f5.6 and only the center is cross type at F4, the difference is night and day and the 7Dmkii has the best AF system I have used!

It is hard for me to believe to. There must be something wrong with your 1D IV, my copy is very fast and very accurate. From the test I have done the 1D IV is outperforming the 7D II by a fair margin with the long lenses. On shorter lenses there is little difference.
 
Upvote 0
coreyhkh said:
There is nothing wrong with my 1dmkiv I have used 3 and they are all the same, there is nothing that the 1dmkiv has AF wise that is better then the 7Dmkii.

my pictures speak for them selfs www.flickr.com/photos/corey-hayes/
I checked out your pictures and your right they speak for themselves ,they are awesome !!! did you find the focus speed faster with the larger battery on the mk IV vs lp-e6 on the 7d II ?
 
Upvote 0
coreyhkh said:
my pictures speak for them selfs www.flickr.com/photos/corey-hayes/

As to whichever body you used ability to focus and your skill as a photographer yes.

As to whether the 7D II or the 1D IV has the better AF system no. Both cameras will achieve focus and both have fine AF systems. It is the shots you do not get that matter in this comparison.
 
Upvote 0
coreyhkh said:
There is nothing wrong with my 1dmkiv I have used 3 and they are all the same, there is nothing that the 1dmkiv has AF wise that is better then the 7Dmkii.

my pictures speak for them selfs www.flickr.com/photos/corey-hayes/

Not saying that the 7DII isn't better, just that I have never had a problem locking focus on BIF with a 300 2.8 (non-IS!)+ 2x TC or a 300-800 5.6 with my 1D4. The only instance I can think of where my 1D4 struggles is in low light at low angles (eg: when shorebirding at dawn) with my Sigma 300-800. In that very specific case the AF will hunt and have trouble getting a lock unless the bird is large in frame. The sun comes up, the problem goes away.

I'm actually planning on going over to the camera store to try out the 7DII later today since I have Veterans Day off. I'm going to bring my lenses and see how well it works. Its certainly possible that if the 7DII seems like it is better than the 1D4 in a significant way that I can sell off my 1D4 for a little over what the 7DII goes for.

Also, I like your photos and was already following you on flickr before I'd ever seen you post here. Good stuff.
 
Upvote 0