I doubt and hope that they don't actually go about dismantling your camera, for fear that you will be out of a camera and also jeopardising the structural integrity for the sake of "correcting" something that doesn't need to be corrected. I would say that they will only make modification if your particular device features extreme light leaks, beyond those commonly reported.Hesham said:swrightgfx said:Bravo, Canon! Excellently handled by Canon, despite their foolish original statement. Hopefully now, those users who believe this to be an issue will leave these forums in peace.Canon Rumors said:However, if you would like Canon to inspect your camera, we will provide this service free of charge upon request beginning in mid-May.
To those who do send your camera in, do not expect that Canon will "fix" the "issue," but simply acknowledge that the camera is operational as they intended it to be. That is, I doubt they will actually change parts, but merely inspect in case your device is an anomaly and features an actually light leak issue not present in the wider community.
Now, let us put this to bed and start shooting.![]()
They cleverly avoided a re-call. The fact that they identified serial numbers of "affected" bodies is a clear indication that those bodies are different from others. People planning to sell the camera down the road will have a hard time getting good value if their serial falls into this category.
Personally, I am packing the camera today and its going back to the retailer, period.
Time will tell. Please let the rest of us here know the outcome of your actions.
Upvote
0