Canon continues to push forward with a Canon RF 35mm f/1.2L and RF 24mm f/1.2L

[P-visie]

Disregarding my previous comment regarding off-topic, I do not shoot video or focus stack, so I’m confused by this focus breathing explanation on the Leica web site:

View attachment 227721

It seems to be ‘backwards’ – focus breathing is focal length change while focusing, causing image size change, correct?

A lot of macro lenses suffer from focus breathing: the focal lenghth decreases with the focussing distance. Some users on this forum have posted that the focal length of the 100mm macro is 67mm at the minimum focus distance. I do not remember if this was the EF or RF 100mm macro.

 

[Del Paso]

Thanks, the champagne good and is our ‘everyday’ bubbly. For special occasions, we drink Bollinger La Grande Année or Dom Pérignon.

Even -much- better!

 

[neuroanatomist]

Even -much- better!

Indeed! Napa valley sparkling wine (méthode champenoise, since they're not allowed to call it Champagne) works in mimosas, and I will only drink prosecco under extreme duress.

 

[davidespinosa]

And I was so looking forward to reading 42 comments about f/1.2 lenses...

 

[Malm]

Well, the patent shows that Canon is looking into classical - non-VCM - photo lenses for the non-video interested photographers. It's not looking cheap, but fast and I assume a very good image quality. That are lenses I might be interested in.