Don Haines said:Somehow, I doubt that this is the new "affordable telephoto" rumoured to be added to the Canon lineup.....
applecider said:Any idea as to aperture and weight? Is fluoride still needed if br is used?
Please someone at show check it out....
And tell us about it.
kaihp said:OK, I'll bite.
What does "BR" stand for in this context?
Ahh, thanks.candc said:That's for the new "blue refractive" lens elements.
Meatcurry said:Does anyone care to speculate why the barrel looks like that?
kubelik said:Meatcurry said:Does anyone care to speculate why the barrel looks like that?
I'll throw out a wild guess - it's probably just a big thick container that is easy to manufacture/modify while they test the actual inner workings of the lens
fegari said:Do diffractive optics also alter the diamater needs to achieve an f/4 or f2.8 lens? I mean, If they release those "compact" 600/4 and 500/4 in DO, does that mean they can do a 600/2.8 and 500/2.8 also with DO but in the current form factor of the 600-500/4?
The largest element diameter is the focal length divided by the F-stop... Diffractive Optics lenses do not change this.... a 600F2.8DO lens would need a 214mm first element and that makes for a huge! lens....
vscd said:The largest element diameter is the focal length divided by the F-stop... Diffractive Optics lenses do not change this.... a 600F2.8DO lens would need a 214mm first element and that makes for a huge! lens....
Not Frontelement, but an 214mm aperture. By the way... it seems the green ring is gone to red with BR Elements![]()