M
mitch.o
Guest
mirekti said:it's more than around midnight EST :.
..wanna go to bed
I'm gonna give it another 2 hours. I'm on Mountain Standard Time
Upvote
0
mirekti said:it's more than around midnight EST :.
..wanna go to bed
Following that logic, one would hope that the 6..D.. would be at least as good as the 7..D.. right?Imagination_landB said:Ok let's read the name all togheter. 6...D... GREAT!. So logically spec'd under 5d's right? also they call it an ENTRY LEVEL full-frame. so what were you expecting? Yess over priced a bit, 1800 should be the price. It will for sure be better than the 5dmarkII since its a 5years old camera and the new sensors and digic5+ are better..but don't expect it to be as good as the markIII and I doubt very much that the IQ will be better, maybe near as good but never better , and for ISO eprformance wait until it comes out but 1/2 to a full stop worse maybe or as good but I don't think so.![]()
shannon76 said:Following that logic, one would hope that the 6..D.. would be at least as good as the 7..D.. right?Imagination_landB said:Ok let's read the name all togheter. 6...D... GREAT!. So logically spec'd under 5d's right? also they call it an ENTRY LEVEL full-frame. so what were you expecting? Yess over priced a bit, 1800 should be the price. It will for sure be better than the 5dmarkII since its a 5years old camera and the new sensors and digic5+ are better..but don't expect it to be as good as the markIII and I doubt very much that the IQ will be better, maybe near as good but never better , and for ISO eprformance wait until it comes out but 1/2 to a full stop worse maybe or as good but I don't think so.![]()
Especially for $2000. Looks like that won't be the case though in many ways.
As I said, entry level** fullf frame, and 7d is one of the very best aps-c camera on the market. two different categories too, FF vs APS-C. 5dmark II is surpassed by some of the specs of the 7d(i know its older)shannon76 said:Following that logic, one would hope that the 6..D.. would be at least as good as the 7..D.. right?Imagination_landB said:Ok let's read the name all togheter. 6...D... GREAT!. So logically spec'd under 5d's right? also they call it an ENTRY LEVEL full-frame. so what were you expecting? Yess over priced a bit, 1800 should be the price. It will for sure be better than the 5dmarkII since its a 5years old camera and the new sensors and digic5+ are better..but don't expect it to be as good as the markIII and I doubt very much that the IQ will be better, maybe near as good but never better , and for ISO eprformance wait until it comes out but 1/2 to a full stop worse maybe or as good but I don't think so.![]()
Especially for $2000. Looks like that won't be the case though in many ways.
steliosk said:how about the AF system? same as slow as 5D 2?
Articulated LCD : Fixed
Touch screen : Yes
SUCKS!!!!!!!!
who gives a damn about touch screen?
another waste of time waiting on a FF with an articulated screen... perhaps canon will build one after 10 years...
arrrrgh!!!!!!!
dr croubie said:shannon76 said:Following that logic, one would hope that the 6..D.. would be at least as good as the 7..D.. right?Imagination_landB said:Ok let's read the name all togheter. 6...D... GREAT!. So logically spec'd under 5d's right? also they call it an ENTRY LEVEL full-frame. so what were you expecting? Yess over priced a bit, 1800 should be the price. It will for sure be better than the 5dmarkII since its a 5years old camera and the new sensors and digic5+ are better..but don't expect it to be as good as the markIII and I doubt very much that the IQ will be better, maybe near as good but never better , and for ISO eprformance wait until it comes out but 1/2 to a full stop worse maybe or as good but I don't think so.![]()
Especially for $2000. Looks like that won't be the case though in many ways.
There's not many ways this is better than the 7D, except for the size of the sensor.
heck, it's barely any better than a 5D2, and yet it's priced above where the 5D2 was lately...
wahoophoto said:I'll definitely wait to see how the reviews stack up between the Nikon D600 and 6D, but based on the specs I'm going to have to give serious consideration to a switch to Nikon. I have all EF-S glass anyway, so I'll have to sell my lenses either way. Other draw of the Nikon lineup is the 14-24.
Yea really. I don't get all the 7D and 5D MK II owners who want this badly. That'd be like an upgrade from the 50D to 60D. I actually think going from 7D to MK II isn't an upgrade either. Better low light and more MP really. I own the T2i,a nd am saving for a MK III.wilddreamer said:i just hoping that when 6D come out, the price of 5D mark 3 will getting cheaper and i will get the mark 3 instead. thank you canon
spinworkxroy said:Ah damm..
I was sooo looking forward to this camera as a 2nd body…
2 things kinda is a bummer to me.
1) 11AF point…only 11?
2) 97% viewfinder….100% should be a requirement for a FF!
Advantage…D600
WoodyWindy said:There must be at least one typo in the specs that folks are grabbing from - the rear screen resolution simply can't be right. "102,400" is just over 500x200 dots - less resolution than some of the original DSLRs with sub 2 inch screens.
RGomezPhotos said:This is a Super Rebel. And you know what? The Rebels are darn fine cameras. AND are great sellers. The t2i - t4i have gotten fantastic reviews. This will be a good upgrade choice for current Rebel owners. This means big money for Canon. Built-in WiFi and GPS? 20MP? This is a NICE camera.
The 1DX and 5D3 should have come with built-in WiFi for those prices.... There's no excuse... I'm still pissed the 5D3 doesnt have a user-replaceable focus-screen, no dual CF slots and no built-in WiFi. The 5D3 is a PRO camera.
The 6D is an exciting camera. I'm REALLY interested in what their 7D2 will look like.![]()