Canon officially announces the development of the RF 100-500 f/4.5-7.1L IS USM, 1.4x and 2.0x extenders

Maximilian

The dark side - I've been there
CR Pro
Nov 7, 2013
3,648
2,866
Germany
Interesting to see that there are still 5 (five) lines free in the lens roadmap for 2020 ;)
Let's see if they'll be filled up and with what of the rumored stuff...
 

Optics Patent

Former Nikon (Changes to R5 upon delivery)
Nov 6, 2019
310
248
Disappointingly the TCs lack the matte metal Finish at their rear that matches the R mount. The lenses and control ring EF adapter all have this.

What lenses will the TCs serve? Could there be a RF300 f 2.8 on the way?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Daner

6degrees

RF 85mm F1.2
Sep 6, 2018
122
83
Glad I waited, I was going to get the 70-200, but in truth the 100-500 (completely different lens, no argument there) is a better fit to travel alongside the 24-105L. Hoping for a 10-24L in the near future :cool:


Canon RF 14-21mm f/1.4L
 
  • Like
Reactions: RGB86

Daner

AE-1 Program
Aug 15, 2017
113
115
Stockholm
danethomasphotography.com
f/holy hell it better be sunny out!

That combination works well enough even when it is moony out!
FV9A0890.jpeg
 

Daner

AE-1 Program
Aug 15, 2017
113
115
Stockholm
danethomasphotography.com
Disappointingly the TCs lack the matte metal Finish at their rear that matches the R mount. The lenses and control ring EF adapter all have this.

What lenses will the TCs serve? Could there be a RF300 f 2.8 on the way?

My question exactly. It seems odd to announce them at this point when they don't seem to be compatible with any currently available lenses. It will be interesting to see how well they work with the RF 100-500, and if they can be stacked.
 
Last edited:

Daner

AE-1 Program
Aug 15, 2017
113
115
Stockholm
danethomasphotography.com
7.1? What's that with the teleconverter? Ugh..

Not what I was hoping for. I shoot F.8 with my 100-400L II with the 1.4. Looks like that will continue to be the better combo unless I'm missing something.

I have used that exact combo for a while with my EOS R. 100-400 with the EF-RF adapter, or 140-560 with the 1.4 TC and the EF-RF adapter. We don't have specifications yet, but I am pretty sure that the RF 100-500 will be smaller and lighter than the 100-400 plus the adapter, while offering comparable light-gathering ability between 100 and 400, with additional reach. My primary question is whether it will retain the close-focus ability of the 100-400.
 

Steve Balcombe

Too much gear
Aug 1, 2014
263
183
My primary question is whether it will retain the close-focus ability of the 100-400.
The focus limiter suggests an MFD of 3.0 m, so apparently not. However the 100-400 has massive focus breathing, so if they've managed to improve on that it might not be quite as bad as the MFD implies.
 

ozturert

EOS 90D
Jan 16, 2019
141
109
7.1? What's that with the teleconverter? Ugh..

Not what I was hoping for. I shoot F.8 with my 100-400L II with the 1.4. Looks like that will continue to be the better combo unless I'm missing something.
Your combo gives you 560mm f8, this lens will give you 500mm f7.1, without teleconverter. Not a huge difference, I'd say but you won't need teleconverter.
 

Gazwas

EOS RP
Sep 3, 2018
233
204
We're developing 7 lenses for release in 2020............ Yahoo!! :p

But they are all a secret and we're only telling you what one of them is.......... What?? :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phil

Jasonmc89

EOS 80D
Feb 7, 2019
313
346
UK
Okay, I get that f7.1 isn’t a big deal for a mirrorless full frame camera, but for an “L” lens?

Doesn’t say “L” to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gwooding

gzroxas

Canon EOS R / Travel and Landscape
Oct 3, 2018
60
78
Italy
Has anyone noticed that it seems like there are 4 rings? (Zoom, Focus, Control Ring and...?)