Harry Muff said:Adorama just dropped the ball:
Unless they create placeholders ahead of time with unconfirmed specs that they get from rumor sitesHarry Muff said:Adorama isn't a rumour site. They won't write anything unless they've got something to write.
In this case, their site has created a rumour. One that is disputed by NR.Harry Muff said:Adorama isn't a rumour site. They won't write anything unless they've got something to write.
Harry Muff said:Adorama isn't a rumour site. They won't write anything unless they've got something to write.
privatebydesign said:If this is correct it is really good news, it is a real MkII, wonder why they didn't call it a D5?
dilbert said:Given that CR and NL both questioned the legitimacy of the G1XII image with the external EVF, I'm wondering about how good the "fake" detection is in various people.
Harry Muff said:Adorama isn't a rumour site. They won't write anything unless they've got something to write.
neuroanatomist said:Harry Muff said:Adorama isn't a rumour site. They won't write anything unless they've got something to write.
So, is the Adorama page still up?
dstppy said:Whoops, gotta start a "How will Canon respond to the D4S" thread first . . .
ksagomonyants said:dstppy said:Whoops, gotta start a "How will Canon respond to the D4S" thread first . . .
You'll be surprised
http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=18995.0
It was a slow news day...dstppy said:*faint* I didn't even click that before . . . Craig started it??? I thought it was a random poster trying to get us going again.ksagomonyants said:You'll be surpriseddstppy said:Whoops, gotta start a "How will Canon respond to the D4S" thread first . . .
http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=18995.0