• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Ef 200-400 1.4 vs 70-200 2.8 mk2 cropped or with 2x tele, or crop sensor body?

AlanF said:
FEBS said:
AlanF said:
Is the 1-stop improvement in JPEG or RAW?

Raw

I ask questions in order to learn. Having been stimulated by your comments to look at a series of careful reviews, I see that up to iso 3200 there is little difference in practice between the 1D X and 5DIII noise, then the 1 DX begins to pull away, as you intimate. As I am interested in very fine details in plumage etc, I tend to shoot at 640 and max out at 1600 so the difference doesn't really affect me but I can see where it would help some others. Thanks for your help as I have never handled a 1D X and have to rely on others for advice.

No problem Alan. I'm also here to learn and where it is possible I give answers. I do understand now that you look for the very fine detail. I rather take sports. In sports a ISO 6400 of a 5d3 is still acceptable if applied the correct post processing. As mentioned before, I have no problem to go to 12800 or even 25600 on the 1dx. Mostly caused that after post processing you can't tell the difference with a 5d3 @ 6400iso. Yes, this is based on practice.

I know you are a big fan of the tamron 150-600. I have seen many times your replies and advices there about. I did read them a lot and enjoyed your experience with that big Ron. At the end I did however strike it from the short list to go on safari. I do have the 300 2.8 II, but my biggest concern was constantly changing extenders. Also for sports I would like the versatility of a zoom. At the end I pulled the trigger and bought the 200-400. I know it's bigger and heavier then the 150-600, but the iq is excellent from 200 till 560. I have also seen pictures on 784mm of that lens and they really looked good. This however I still have to test myself because I have to find out if it is ok for me on the way I use it. Perhaps, this might be a negative property of myself, but I like to see and test it myself before I will tell something here on the forum.
 
Upvote 0
The 300mm f/2.8 II is my favourite lens and I preferentially use it on birding trips at home. But, the Tamron 150-600mm is good enough and is just so convenient for travel when I have to fly for a holiday. But, if I were to go on a specialist birding trip abroad or go on safari again I would take the 300 + extenders on the 5DIII and the 70-200 f/4 IS + 70D.
 
Upvote 0