• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM vs. EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rokkor 58mm 1.2
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I too was in your boat. I owned the 70-200mm f/4 for almost 3 years and it was a great lens. It was tack sharp wide open and it was about 1.5lbs so it was not too bad to walk around with (I had a 40D at the time, upgraded now to 5D MIII). I never had an issues with the lens and on my crop made for a very nice portrait lens. I have now upgraded to the 70-200mm f/2.8 II and sold the f/4 and this is easily the best lens I own (it's ultra responsive responsive as the f/4 was and tack sharp at all apertures but it's tack sharp at 2.8 which a lot of zooms are not). HOWEVER, it weighs twice as much and is like $1k more. I will remove the tripod collar when I am out to reduce the weight somewhat so believe me there are times when I do miss the f/4! But I really wanted the f/2.8 even at double the weight. You cannot go wrong either way and the f/4 is an excellent lens. Ideally I would have kept both!
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.